America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 days ago by DrMaddVibe. 270 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
January 6: The Season Finale
Brewha Offline
#201 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Sorry.

I accept your apology.
drglnc Offline
#202 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
I watched the longer version that shows more of the story… no evidence the office k ew those tactical officers were coming up behind the group… she was not shot in the face… she was not on the other side of the door… she was literally climbing through the broken window of the barricaded doors leading to a location that members of congress were still located was was realistically only the first of many that would have gone in… clear and present danger…
ZRX1200 Offline
#203 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
https://youtu.be/o4TcvRyplwE

Mostly peaceful.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#204 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Brewha wrote:
I accept your apology.



It wasn't for you. It was for you being so stupid that you caused coffee to spew on a computer screen.

But while you want to try to be wordy, how's about commenting on the Buffalo Man being ushered around the halls of that sacred dump where they waste time and money. Kinda hard to call it an insurrection when you're escorted through the halls and they try to open the door to the chamber for the guy. Please, tell all about how they burned the place to the ground and killed people all while wresting control of the government.
drglnc Offline
#205 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
ZRX1200 wrote:
https://youtu.be/o4TcvRyplwE

Mostly peaceful.



I really hope they are able to identify, catch, and prosecute more of them...

I also hope that new training center has a specific course designated for how to lock a gate...
Brewha Offline
#206 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
It wasn't for you. It was for you being so stupid that you caused coffee to spew on a computer screen.

But while you want to try to be wordy, how's about commenting on the Buffalo Man being ushered around the halls of that sacred dump where they waste time and money. Kinda hard to call it an insurrection when you're escorted through the halls and they try to open the door to the chamber for the guy. Please, tell all about how they burned the place to the ground and killed people all while wresting control of the government.



Indian giver!

Buffalo man? Do you mean the rioter known as ‘QAnon Shaman’ who was sentenced to 41 months?
RiverRatRuss Offline
#207 Posted:
Joined: 09-02-2022
Posts: 1,035
HockeyDad wrote:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp-video/mmvo99180613572




Thanks HD, I'll check it out later... for now I gotta go play with my Wood!!! errr ummm cut up a Tree...Herfing Beer
HockeyDad Offline
#208 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Brewha wrote:
Indian giver!

Buffalo man? Do you mean the rioter known as ‘QAnon Shaman’ who was sentenced to 41 months?


That guy was the leader of the country formerly known as the United States for around two hours. The counter-revolution took him out.
MACS Offline
#209 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,789
drglnc wrote:
I watched the longer version that shows more of the story… no evidence the office k ew those tactical officers were coming up behind the group… she was not shot in the face… she was not on the other side of the door… she was literally climbing through the broken window of the barricaded doors leading to a location that members of congress were still located was was realistically only the first of many that would have gone in… clear and present danger…


Know how you clear that entire area without killing anyone? Pepper ball rounds. Tear gas. Pepper spray. Bean bag shotguns. Hard rubber projectiles.

Once again, your lack of experience in LE makes you ignorant. You just don't know the myriad of other options that could have and should have been used, before it even got to that point.

Edit: Even AT that point they could have been used. She did not need to be shot.
Brewha Offline
#210 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
HockeyDad wrote:
That guy was the leader of the country formerly known as the United States for around two hours. The counter-revolution took him out.

So....Amerka ain't gonna be great again?
HockeyDad Offline
#211 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Brewha wrote:
So....Amerka ain't gonna be great again?


After what was done to the Native Americans it is hard to consider that it ever was great.
Brewha Offline
#212 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
HockeyDad wrote:
After what was done to the Native Americans it is hard to consider that it ever was great.

Well, the term "great" is relative.

for example, I have a "great uncle"...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#213 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Brewha wrote:
Indian giver!

Buffalo man? Do you mean the rioter known as ‘QAnon Shaman’ who was sentenced to 41 months?


What was the crime? Being escorted by more than 2 Capitol policemen???

Still haven't seen the video have you?

https://youtu.be/HPg9N_HiLMg


Oh, it was the praying that did him in.
drglnc Offline
#214 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
MACS wrote:
Know how you clear that entire area without killing anyone? Pepper ball rounds. Tear gas. Pepper spray. Bean bag shotguns. Hard rubber projectiles.

Once again, your lack of experience in LE makes you ignorant. You just don't know the myriad of other options that could have and should have been used, before it even got to that point.

Edit: Even AT that point they could have been used. She did not need to be shot.



So... what your saying is Guns aren't the answer, Police need more training, and more use of non lethal force when dealing with ALL people? Careful now... you are starting to sound like a liberal Lizard Person...


as for my ignorance you are very wrong sir... I worked for Diplomatic Security and lived in Ankara Turkey through terrorist attacks, our Embassy being bombed in 2013, one of our Guards being blown up and 3 injured, Drive byes on motorcycles, Riots/Protests in 2013 literally feet from my office with tear gas, Water Cannons loaded with pepper spray, rubber bullets... , car/bus bombs in 2016, and got out just before a Military coop.

I am very familiar with all of it yet every time someone suggests these means of dealing with unrest they are called liberals, communists and any other number of things...

All of that to be said... it is easy to judge and say what SHOULD have happened but the reality is that officer used what he had available to him, the training he had received, had to live in the moment and now must deal with the knowledge that he took a life... possibly with the end result of saving others... possibly not.
Brewha Offline
#215 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
What was the crime? Being escorted by more than 2 Capitol policemen???

Still haven't seen the video have you?

https://youtu.be/HPg9N_HiLMg


Oh, it was the praying that did him in.


Oh, you still haven't read the news?

Jacob Chansley, the spear-carrying Jan. 6 rioter whose horned fur hat, bare chest and face paint made him one of the more recognizable figures in the assault on the Capitol, was sentenced Wednesday to 41 months in prison.

Chansley, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, was among the first rioters to enter the building. He has acknowledged using a bullhorn to rile up the mob, offering thanks in a prayer while in the Senate for having the chance to get rid of traitors and scratching out a threatening note to Vice President Mike Pence saying, “It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming!”




Of course we can't trust that he plead guilty, can we??? LOL
drglnc Offline
#216 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
DrMaddVibe wrote:
What was the crime? Being escorted by more than 2 Capitol policemen???

Still haven't seen the video have you?

https://youtu.be/HPg9N_HiLMg


Oh, it was the praying that did him in.



the first 2 minutes is priceless... Tucker railing against something he has been proven to do... then going on to use cherry picked footage to try and prove the point...

The left cherry picks footage to show it was all violence...

the right cherry picks to show it was a tour...

they are both doing a massive disservice to themselves and the people by not acknowledging that many that day were peaceful in the laws they broke... while many that day were violent in the laws they broke...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#217 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Brewha wrote:
Oh, you still haven't read the news?


No, read the news. After seeing the video where he was actually escorted by 2 Capitol policemen and they were trying to open doors for him. THAT wasn't in the papers was it??? Then the entire cropped video that you graciously wanted to quote but you remain in your corner because it fits the narrative they told you to believe. He was ushered by 2 and walked right by 9 officers. Where was the threat? Where was the damage he created? You remain convinced he actually deserves 41 months of prison for that?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#218 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
drglnc wrote:
the first 2 minutes is priceless... Tucker railing against something he has been proven to do... then going on to use cherry picked footage to try and prove the point...

The left cherry picks footage to show it was all violence...

the right cherry picks to show it was a tour...

they are both doing a massive disservice to themselves and the people by not acknowledging that many that day were peaceful in the laws they broke... while many that day were violent in the laws they broke...



You weren't shown the complete footage UNTIL your so called "right" go to it. Oh, congressmen wanted it. Demanded it be entered and as a matter of fact the sham show Pelosi gave us in Primetime was nothing but propaganda designed to impune.
Brewha Offline
#219 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
No, read the news. After seeing the video where he was actually escorted by 2 Capitol policemen and they were trying to open doors for him. THAT wasn't in the papers was it??? Then the entire cropped video that you graciously wanted to quote but you remain in your corner because it fits the narrative they told you to believe. He was ushered by 2 and walked right by 9 officers. Where was the threat? Where was the damage he created? You remain convinced he actually deserves 41 months of prison for that?


Does the video say why he plead guilty?

Of course not. But let me guess - he never "really" plead guilty - it's just a conspiracy!

LOL
HockeyDad Offline
#220 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
I think we all can agree that the January 6 insurrection was on par with 9/11 and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor so it is a bit surprising the level of effort taken to hide the 41,000 hours of video footage from the American public.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#221 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Brewha wrote:
Does the video say why he plead guilty?

Of course not. But let me guess - he never "really" plead guilty - it's just a conspiracy!

LOL



I NEVER asked nor wanted to know why he plead guilty. YOU brought that in because the narrative you cling to was shattered with reality. You cannot admit it either.
MACS Offline
#222 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,789
drglnc wrote:
So... what your saying is Guns aren't the answer, Police need more training, and more use of non lethal force when dealing with ALL people? Careful now... you are starting to sound like a liberal Lizard Person...


as for my ignorance you are very wrong sir... I worked for Diplomatic Security and lived in Ankara Turkey through terrorist attacks, our Embassy being bombed in 2013, one of our Guards being blown up and 3 injured, Drive byes on motorcycles, Riots/Protests in 2013 literally feet from my office with tear gas, Water Cannons loaded with pepper spray, rubber bullets... , car/bus bombs in 2016, and got out just before a Military coop.

I am very familiar with all of it yet every time someone suggests these means of dealing with unrest they are called liberals, communists and any other number of things...

All of that to be said... it is easy to judge and say what SHOULD have happened but the reality is that officer used what he had available to him, the training he had received, had to live in the moment and now must deal with the knowledge that he took a life... possibly with the end result of saving others... possibly not.


My mistake for assuming, but the assumption was based on your response. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. In my professional opinion the officer did not need to shoot her.

As far as my response being liberal, it changes based on the situation. An actual physical fight with a man is 100% different than being confronted by a woman, crazy or not. I did NOT say guns aren't the answer, nor did I say police need more training. They are very well trained in most circumstances, but each individual may not absorb that training the same. And yes... if less lethal options are appropriate, they should absolutely be used in every circumstance possible.

I give zero effs what color the criminal is. It's the behavior that is the problem, not the skin color.

I do not support the vandalization of our capitol. Nor do I support the way SOME of those people acted, and they 100% should be prosecuted for any crime committed. The problem I have is that it WAS a mostly peaceful protest and we were deliberately lied to about what went down and how it went down.

DrafterX Offline
#223 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
I heard Pelosi told everbody there was free donuts in da Rotunda... Mellow
Stogie1020 Offline
#224 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,338
DrafterX wrote:
I heard Pelosi told everbody there was free donuts in da Rotunda... Mellow

if it was Pelosi, it was more likely free Vodka-tinis...
burning_sticks Offline
#225 Posted:
Joined: 08-17-2020
Posts: 152
Chansley, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, was among the first rioters to enter the building. He has acknowledged using a bullhorn to rile up the mob, offering thanks in a prayer while in the Senate for having the chance to get rid of traitors and scratching out a threatening note to Vice President Mike Pence saying, “It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming!”



Of course we can't trust that he plead guilty, can we??










My guess is he plead guilty to get the four year sentence vs the possibility of getting 20. That's the way plea deals work, doesn't mean he actually thought he was guilty.
ZRX1200 Offline
#226 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
4 years seems legit for being loud and writing a nasty note.

And saying a prayer for the cops.

The level of cognitive dissonance is something.
Brewha Offline
#227 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I NEVER asked nor wanted to know why he plead guilty. YOU brought that in because the narrative you cling to was shattered with reality. You cannot admit it either.

The man is doing 41 month in the Federal Jail House because he admitted to a felony.

So....yes. I'll "cling" to my little "narrative".




You enjoy that Tucker Kool Aid Doc.

LOL
Brewha Offline
#228 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
burning_sticks wrote:
Chansley, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, was among the first rioters to enter the building. He has acknowledged using a bullhorn to rile up the mob, offering thanks in a prayer while in the Senate for having the chance to get rid of traitors and scratching out a threatening note to Vice President Mike Pence saying, “It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming!”



Of course we can't trust that he plead guilty, can we??










My guess is he plead guilty to get the four year sentence vs the possibility of getting 20. That's the way plea deals work, doesn't mean he actually thought he was guilty.




So - you want ice in that Kool Aid?
rfenst Offline
#229 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,330
Brewha wrote:
Oh, you still haven't read the news?

Jacob Chansley, the spear-carrying Jan. 6 rioter whose horned fur hat, bare chest and face paint made him one of the more recognizable figures in the assault on the Capitol, was sentenced Wednesday to 41 months in prison.

Chansley, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, was among the first rioters to enter the building. He has acknowledged using a bullhorn to rile up the mob, offering thanks in a prayer while in the Senate for having the chance to get rid of traitors and scratching out a threatening note to Vice President Mike Pence saying, “It’s Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming!”




Of course we can't trust that he plead guilty, can we??? LOL

"He also apologized for his role in attacking the Capitol, saying that in the days since, he has often looked into the mirror and told himself, 'You really messed up, royally.'"
DrafterX Offline
#230 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Cause there were no donuts..?? Huh
frankj1 Online
#231 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
William!
Do you want we should fix this place?
RayR Online
#232 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
Are Brewha and Robert upset about Tucker airing some videos that were previously kept in the dark by the regime.?
Do they think that Tucker is a threat to duhmacracy and should be censored and canceled as Chucky Schummer said?
Do they agree with STEVE SCHMIDT (the now disgraced little boy groomer and former leader of The Lincoln Project), saying, about Chansley, "Shoot him, shoot him," to wild applause from his audience?

Just asking. Think

Tucker: The government hid this from you about Jan 6
https://youtu.be/Vs-il4uS5mM

Tucker Carlson: Here is the truth
https://youtu.be/HPg9N_HiLMg






DrMaddVibe Offline
#233 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
They're not upset at all. In their minds Tucker Carlson made it all up. Their primetime shows depicting the beheadings, rapes and murders that day of Jan 6th was a MAGA Insurrection. They tore the nation apart to never be put together again. Ever. Why the only thing weaker than the Humpty Dumpty beliefs that once again Donald Trump destroyed this nation are their feelings.


Did The 'QAnon Shaman' Get Shafted On Sentencing? New Footage Raises Questions Over The Chansley Case



If there is one image from Jan. 6th that will remain indelible with the day, it is the “QAnon Shaman.” Bare chested and wearing an animal headdress, horns and red-white-and-blue face paint, Jake Angeli Chansley is to the Capitol riot what Rosie the Riveter was to World War II. Howling and “chanting an unintelligible mantra” on the Senate floor, he is the embodiment of the unhinged rage that led to one of the most disgraceful attacks on our constitutional process in history.

However, the newly released Fox footage from that day raises serious questions over the prosecution and punishment of Chansley.

The videotapes aired on Tucker Carlson this week show Chansley being escorted by officers through the Capitol. Two officers appear to not only guide him to the floor but actually appear to be trying to open locked doors for him. At one point, Chansley is shown walking unimpeded through a large number of armed officers with his four-foot flag-draped spear and horned Viking helmet on his way to the Senate floor.

It is otherworldly footage. While I admit that I approach these stories from the perspective of a long-standing criminal defense attorney, I would be outraged if I was unable to see such evidence before a plea or sentencing. At no point in the videotapes does Chansley appear violent or threatening. Indeed, he appears to thank the officers for their guidance and assistance. On the Senate floor, Chansley actually gave a prayer to thank the officers agreed “to allow us into the building.”

Before addressing the legal implications of this footage, one thing should be clear. The public should have been given access to this footage long ago and the Jan. 6th Committee withheld important evidence on what occurred inside the Capitol on that day.

While it is understandable that many would object to Carlson being given an exclusive in the initial release, many in the media are denouncing the release of the footage to the public at all. The press and pundits are now opposing greater transparency in resisting any contradiction of the narrative put forward by the Jan. 6th Committee. Indeed, MSNBC’s Jason Johnson angrily objected that this is “federal evidence” — ignoring that it is evidence that was denied to criminal defendants.

This is not just material that the public should be able to see, it was potential evidence in criminal cases like that of the QAnon Shaman.

When the footage aired, I wrote a column raising the question of whether this evidence was known to or shared with Chansley’s defense.

After all, he was portrayed as a violent offender by the Justice Department at his sentencing.

It now appears that the answer is no. I spoke with Chansley’s new counsel, Bill Shipley, and confirmed that defense counsel did not have this material.

In the hearing, federal prosecutor Kimberly Paschall played videos showing Chansley yelling along with the crowd and insisted “that is not peaceful.”

That portrayal of Chansley would have been more difficult to maintain if the Court was allowed to see images of Chansley casually walking through a door of the Capitol with hundreds of other protesters and then being escorted by officers through the Capitol. At no point is he violent and at no point is he shown destroying evidence. Instead, he dutifully follows the officers who facilitate his going eventually to the unoccupied Senate floor.

We all knew that Chansley was treated more harshly because of his visibility. It was his costume, not his conduct, that seemed to drive the sentencing. In the hearing, Judge Royce Lamberth noted, “He made himself the image of the riot, didn’t he? For good or bad, he made himself the very image of this whole event.”

Lamberth hit Chansley with a heavy 41-month sentence for “obstructing a federal proceeding.”

However, the QAnon Shaman was led through the Capitol by officers. Defense counsel could have noted that his “obstruction” in going to an unoccupied Senate floor was facilitated by officers. While the police were clearly trying to deescalate the situation after the Capitol was breached, this is evidence of how Chansley came to the Senate. Indeed, his interaction with officers could have impacted how he viewed the gravity of his conduct. It certainly would have been material to the court in sentencing the conduct.

In his rambling sentencing statement to the court, Chansley apologized for “a lot of bad juju that I never meant to create.”

I have great respect for Judge Lamberth, who has always shown an admirable resistance to public pressure in high profile cases. I cannot imagine that Lamberth would not have found this footage material and frankly alarming.

At first blush, this would appear a clear “Brady violation” when a prosecutor fails to provide a defendant with any evidence that is favorable or exculpatory to his case. Like most things in Chansley’s life, it is a bit more complex than it would seem.

First, Chansley quickly pleaded guilty to the charge. This may have been due in part to the draconian treatment that he received by the Justice Department, which insisted on keeping him in solitary confinement with no apparent justification. The result is that he moved rapidly to sentencing without significant discovery in his case.

Second, the footage was in the possession of the legislative branch so the Justice Department could claim that it was not required to produce it. Indeed, the prosecution may have been entirely unaware of the footage.

Third, Chansley waived an appeal of the plea agreement and is now weeks away from release. The case is practically closed.

It is not clear, however, if Judge Lamberth will find the failure to disclose this evidence troubling and worthy of inquiry. None of this means that Chansley should not have been given jail time. Indeed, it is appropriate to sentence rioters to greater than average time due to the assault on our constitutional process.

Yet, it is hard to believe that Judge Lamberth would have given 41 months to a nonviolent, first offender who was led through the Capitol by police officers to the floor.

This was a Navy veteran who pleaded guilty to the crime.

The role of Congress in withholding this footage is disgraceful and wrong. The Congress and the January 6th Committee knew of this footage and its relevance to a pending criminal case. Yet, they refused to make it public. Instead, the January 6th Committee hired a former ABC producer to put on a made-for-television production of highly edited images for public consumption. Countervailing evidence or images were consistently excluded and witnesses appeared as virtual props to support high-quality video packages.

Even The New York Times admitted the narrative was meant to “recast the midterm message” and “give [Democrats] a platform for making a broader case about why they deserve to stay in power.”

The image of the QAnon Shaman being escorted through the Capitol by police officers is hardly the image that they wanted to show the public. So Committee members and counsel buried footage that was clearly relevant to literally hundreds of people facing criminal sentencing across the country. They did this while repeatedly referencing those cases in hearings as upholding the rule of law.

I hold little sympathy for Chansley or the others arrested on that day. I was highly critical of President Donald Trump’s remarks before the riot.

However, it is hard to see this withheld evidence and not conclude that the Qanon Shaman got the shaft on his sentencing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/turley-did-qanon-shaman-get-shafted-sentencing-new-footage-raises-questions-over-chansley
Brewha Offline
#234 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Tune in again tomorrow for another exciting episode of Captain CutNPaste and his trusty sidekick BoBo the wonder chimp as they bend both minds and reality in the relentless pursuit of smoking Tucker Carlson’s deek.

Brought to you by Carl Jr’s.
RayR Online
#235 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
Just for Brewha...

Real Jan 6th: U.S. Gov. Murders 2 Women, Frames and Imprisons Political Enemies

By Ben Armstrong
The New American

March 10, 2023

Ashli Babbitt and Rosanne Boyland were killed by capitol police and almost nobody on capitol hill cares. They may even be glad it happened. Most on Capitol Hill do not care that people were wrongfully imprisoned and still are being held as political trophy prisoners.

[VIDEO]

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/03/no_author/real-jan-6th-u-s-gov-murders-2-women-frames-and-imprisons-political-enemies/

DrMaddVibe Offline
#236 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Top Democrat On J6 Committee: We Actually Didn’t Review Any Of The Surveillance Video



After Fox News host Tucker Carlson aired Capitol surveillance footage this week exposing yet more falsehood from the House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and leaving Democrats and their media allies irate, the committee chair on Wednesday said the panel never actually analyzed the crucial footage.

On Monday’s edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Fox News aired the footage of the riot on Jan. 6, 2021, undermining the select committee’s narrative of a “deadly insurrection.” Given access to the video by Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Carlson’s team reviewed over 40,000 hours of footage, which offered proof the committee manipulated audio and video to dramatize the riot for its made-for-TV hearings in an election year.

But in a Wednesday night statement to CNN, select committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., claimed the panel never analyzed the blockbuster footage Fox News aired this week.

“I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Hiring investigators who “kind of went through the video” doesn’t sound like a very thorough investigation.


However, Thompson’s admission that his committee lacked due diligence makes no sense. Since when do lawmakers have no access to the same material as their own staffers? Did none of the nine panel members view the footage that was played for the cameras? Does Thompson not know who had access to the tapes? Was it just the former television executives they hired to produce their show trials? Either Thompson is lying and knows exactly who had access, or he handed the key to Vice Chair Liz Cheney and had nothing to do with it while the committee leaked exclusives to CNN.

Thompson’s office did not immediately respond to The Federalist’s inquiries.

The committee clearly had access to the footage Carlson aired this week that contradicted the panel’s key narratives. After all, members of the committee endlessly bragged about how many documents, more than 35,000, investigators reviewed. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who used the committee to dodge responsibility for her own failure to secure the Capitol, just refused to make the tapes public — and after Carlson’s revelations, it’s clear why.

Carlson’s program showed that the man who became the face of the “insurrection,” known as the “QAnon Shaman,” was given VIP treatment by police. The tapes showed since-deceased Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick walking around “vigorously” after altercations with protesters who had allegedly murdered him. The footage also showed that mysterious rioter Ray Epps lied to congressional investigators about his whereabouts the day of the riot, yet the committee protected the “insurrectionist.”

On Monday, Carlson announced his team discovered proof that Democrats on Pelosi’s probe came across the same footage Fox made public.

“We can be sure because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the Capitol’s computer system,” said Carlson. “That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party saw this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public.”


Committee staffers even used some of the footage to show Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., allegedly fleeing the Capitol. All Carlson did was extend the footage a few seconds longer than what was televised in the committee’s show-trial hearings, and it became clear Hawley departed the Capitol along with other members of Congress. The clip published by the committee was always demonstrably dishonest.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/03/09/top-democrat-on-j6-committee-we-actually-didnt-review-any-of-the-surveillance-video/



Of course it was dishonest. Same goes for the COVID1984 debacle too.
RayR Online
#237 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
"A professional politician is a professionally dishonorable man. In order to get anywhere near high office he has to make so many compromises and submit to so many humiliations that he becomes indistinguishable from a streetwalker." — H.L. Mencken
DrMaddVibe Offline
#238 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Jacob Chansley's Lawyers Confront DOJ's Claim It Didn't Suppress Jan. 6 Evidence



Authored by Gary Bai via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) latest objection to allegations that it suppressed evidence in its prosecution of Jan. 6 defendant Jacob Chansley flies in the face of the Sixth Amendment, current and former attorneys of Chansley told The Epoch Times in separate interviews this week.

“They are hiding. They affirmatively are electing not to disclose [exculpatory evidence],” Albert Watkins, Jacob Chansley’s former attorney that negotiated the navy veteran’s 41-month sentencing agreement in 2021, told The Epoch Times on Tuesday, referring to the DOJ.

“They’re doing so in a fashion which, in my opinion, gives rise to an inescapable conclusion that the Department of Justice has done more damage to our democracy by how it has treated Jan. 6 defendants than anything that had occurred on January 6.”

Watkins was reacting to the DOJ’s Sunday court filing on another Jan. 6 defendant’s case, in which the government confronted, for the first time in court, the newly surfaced surveillance tapes of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach aired by Fox News’s Tucker Carlson Tonight show.

Among these tapes was a clip showing Chansley, unarmed, walking along with several Capitol Police officers who did not attempt to remove him from the Capitol building, which Carlson said showed that Chansley was less violent on Jan. 6 than described by the government.

Despite the video records of the navy veteran’s behaviour, Chansley’s current and former lawyers argued that the government violated Chansley’s rights by suppressing this evidence during his trial, in response to the DOJ’s claims to the contrary on Sunday.

The answer to this debate is important because it shines a light on the government’s prosecutorial conduct in handling Jan. 6 cases, many of which have ended with swift sentencing.

Chansley is currently serving a 41-month sentence in federal prison after pleading guilty to an obstruction charge in September 2021.

Government Shared All Evidence: DOJ

In a filing on Sunday, the DOJ said it provided the tapes to Chansley’s attorney during the discovery phase of Chansley’s trial in 2021, therefore satisfying the requirement of producing exculpatory evidence, or evidence favoring the defendant, to the defense counsel.

The filing was in response to a motion to dismiss filed by the attorneys of Dominic Pezzola, a Jan. 6 defendant currently on trial, which alleged that the tapes shown on Tucker Carlson show the government “withheld” evidence in prosecuting participants of the Jan. 6 Capitol breach.

“The CCTV footage is core evidence in nearly every January 6 case, and it was produced en masse, labeled by camera number and by time, to all defense counsel in all cases,” the DOJ wrote in its filing.

The department cited Brady v. Maryland, a 1963 case in which the Supreme Court held that prosecutors must make available to the defense counsel exculpatory evidence. As a part of that requirement, the DOJ cited Brady’s text establishing that a Brady violation requires the material in question to be “something that is being ‘suppress[ed] by the prosecution.’”

“Pezzola’s Brady claim therefore fails at the threshold, because nothing has been suppressed,” the DOJ wrote, basing it on the claim that it had provided Watkins with the “necessary tools” to identify relevant CCTV evidence notwithstanding the voluminous discovery.

“Accordingly, the volume of discovery does not excuse defense counsel from making reasonable efforts to ascertain whether an item has been produced, let alone before filing inaccurate and inflammatory allegations of discovery failures,” the DOJ wrote.

DOJ Suppressed Evidence: Chansley’s Lawyers

Chansley’s lawyers disagreed with the DOJ’s claims, saying that the bar for suppression is lower than what the government claims it to be.

“Suppression … is not the nefarious burying of evidence,” Bill Shipley, Jacob Chansley’s current counsel, said in an interview with The Epoch Times on Monday. “It just means it wasn’t brought to light by the government. The government knew what was there and did not illuminate the fact that it was there.”

Shipley says that the government may have violated Brady because they did not identify the tapes and their nature as potentially exculpatory evidence during Chansley’s trial. Making them available without making sure the defendant knows of the existence of the tapes may constitute suppression, according to Shipley.

“Suppression simply means it went undiscovered by the defendant beyond a point at which it could be made use of,” Shipley, who was a federal prosecutor for 21 years, said. “If the government produced thousands of hours of video and said, ‘There’s a minute of evidence that’s favorable to Jacob Chansley—good luck,’ that production is not an effective Brady disclosure.”

The tapes are relevant for reasons beyond proving Chansley’s innocence or guilt, Shipley told The Epoch Times, noting that they are important to answering the question of whether Chansley’s sentence was fair under due process considerations.

“The question is: were Jacob Chansley’s rights to due process and effective assistance of counsel violated? Were the procedural requirements complied with such that the process and outcome of his case was a fair proceeding?” Shipley challenged.

“They’re clearly the kinds of videos that, had Judge [Royce Lamberth] seen them at sentencing, he might have concluded that Mr. Chansey is not the personification of evil in the way the government has made him out to be,” the attorney added. Judge Royce Lamberth presided over Chansley’s trial.

“That might have caused Judge Lambert to think that maybe 41 months was too much time to give him, taking into consideration all of his conduct, as opposed to just the precise conduct the government gave,” Shipley said.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jacob-chansleys-lawyers-confront-dojs-claim-it-didnt-suppress-jan-6-evidence


The very same government that suppressed the videos is the same one that peddled the narrative of "INSURRECTION!!". I don't know about you but when I hear that word I think of Bastille Day or the Boston Tea Party. Jan 6th like I've stated here on multiple posts was a contrived inside job by the FBI and their informants. When you have to peddle out a network tv producer to set up the show in DC for the world to consume at least have the common decency to show that this brutal day of violence was brought to you with Capitol Police tour guides. Tour guides. They took down the barriers, they opened doors, they ushered people in to the halls and offices, they took selfies with the "mob" and they didn't call in for support from the National Guard. It was a sham all along. ANYONE telling you otherwise is a water carrying blithering Biden. The proof is in ALL of the videos and the government KNEW all along what they had on tape and suppressed it.
MACS Offline
#239 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,789
They're still suppressing the videos. Schumer was on TV telling Rupert Murdoch to shut Tucker Carlson down.

Where is the outrage? A sitting Senator telling a media outlet owner to stifle his journalists. And why does he not want the videos released?? Nothing to hide, right? If he is secure in his narrative, there is nothing that could be released that should be worrisome.
Brewha Offline
#240 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
When did Tucker Carlson become a journalist?

Did he change jobs?
RayR Online
#241 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,892
Who does that BLOWHARD LEFTY Schumer thinks he is ordering anybody to suppress FREE SPEECH with his glasses hanging of the tip of his lizard nose? 🦎
He's broken his oath of office again and should rightfully be impeached!
ZRX1200 Offline
#242 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
Tucker is just as much a reporter as literally anyone else on television during a news broadcast……
DrMaddVibe Offline
#243 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
ZRX1200 wrote:
Tucker is just as much a reporter as literally anyone else on television during a news broadcast……


Would you believe that an Op Ed show delivers more journalistic integrity than the Main Street peddlers of lies do?

Seriously.

Why anyone puts any faith in the so called "journalists" any more given their track record...

Even the radio personalities are doing a better job.
Stogie1020 Offline
#244 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,338
Brewha wrote:
When did Tucker Carlson become a journalist?

Did he change jobs?

It's funny how much energy you put into this conversation but never acknowledge the content of these videos or the reasons they were never disclosed...

There's a word for that. It will come to me. Hang on.


Got it. "Deflection."
rfenst Offline
#245 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,330
Woman who gave gloves to Nancy Pelosi laptop thief on Jan. 6 convicted for role in Capitol riot

Law & Crime

A woman whose hand was seen touching the laptop that was stolen from Nancy Pelosi’s office during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol has been convicted for her role in the riot and theft.

Maryann Mooney-Rondon, 56, of Watertown, New York, was found guilty Monday of obstruction of an official proceeding and aiding and abetting the theft of government property. The verdict came from U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb following a stipulated trial, in which Mooney-Rondon and federal prosecutors agreed upon a specific set of facts regarding her actions on Jan. 6, the Justice Department announced in a press release.

According to the statement of stipulated facts, Mooney-Rondon drove with her son Rafael Rondon from Watertown — some 320 miles northwest of New York City — to the Washington, D.C., area on Jan. 5, 2021, to attend Donald Trump’s so-called “Stop the Steal” rally near the White House on Jan. 6. At that event, Trump exhorted his supporters to march to the Capitol and “fight like hell” against Congress’ certification of Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 presidential election. Mooney-Rondon joined that march and entered the building at around 2:23 p.m., around 10 minutes after the building was initially breached by violent rioters who smashed windows and broke doors.

She and her son made their way to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office suite, where they apparently discussed stealing the laptop that they believed belonged to the top Democrat in the House at the time.


“It would be interesting to see what’s on that hard drive,” Mooney-Rondon apparently told an as-yet-unidentified man, according to court documents. She then provided that man with her gloves so that he could “retrieve the laptop computer without leaving fingerprint evidence on the device.”

The man then took the computer.

Afterwards, Mooney-Rondon and her son were seen in the Senate Gallery, where they stole a bag containing an “emergency escape hood,” which contains an air-filtering device that members of Congress and their staff keep on hand to use in case of emergencies. They eventually left the building after about 30 minutes inside, at 2:52 p.m.

According to the federal docket, Mooney-Rondon was also charged with six trespassing and disorderly conduct misdemeanors that carried a combined potential four years behind bars. She was not convicted of those charges.

Mooney-Rondon faces up to 20 years in prison on the obstruction charge and up to one year for the theft charge, plus potential financial penalties.

Her conviction marks the latest development in the prosecution for those accused in stealing then-House Speaker Pelosi’s laptop from her office in the Capitol. Mooney-Rondon’s son Rafael Rondon, 25, pleaded guilty in December to the felony obstruction charge. He is set to be sentenced in June.

On Thursday, Riley June Williams, who was charged — but not convicted — of stealing the laptop and possibly trying to sell it to Russian intelligence was sentenced to three years behind bars. According to prosecutors, when Williams was in Pelosi’s office she told another rioter to “put on gloves” in order to avoid leaving fingerprints on the computer.

Cobb, a Biden appointee, set Mooney-Rondon’s sentencing for July 18.
ZRX1200 Offline
#246 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613

“It would be interesting to see what’s on that hard drive,” Mooney-Rondon apparently told an as-yet-unidentified man, according to court documents. She then provided that man with her gloves so that he could “retrieve the laptop computer without leaving fingerprint evidence on the device.”

Apparent told?

Then there’s assigned intent in quotation marks with no citations as to who it’s attributed to?

This is insanity…..
DrMaddVibe Offline
#247 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Think

Pretty sure Lefty calls it insurrection.
rfenst Offline
#248 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,330
When she voluntarily stipulated to a set of facts in a criminal legal matter, the only question left is legal (not factual)- did or did not the person commit a crime? No jury necessary or proper. Could have pretty much been a confession.

Look up the exact filed court document to see what exactly she stipulated to...
rfenst Offline
#249 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,330
Here you go:



Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ; Case No: 1:21-cr-00722-JMC
Vv.
MARYANN MOONEY-RONDON,

Defendant.

STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR STIPULATED TRIAL

The United States of America, by and through its attorney, the United States Attorney for
the District of Columbia, and the defendant, MARYANN MOONEY-RONDON, with the
concurrence of her attorney, hereby submit the Elements and Statement of Facts for Stipulated
Trial as to Counts | and 3 of the Indictment.

I, Elements

As to Count 1 of the indictment, the essential elements of the offense of obstruction of an official
proceeding and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), each of which the government
must prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt are as follows:

1. The defendant attempted to or did obstruct or impede an official proceeding;

2. The defendant intended to obstruct or impede the official proceeding;

3. The defendant acted knowingly, with awareness that the natural and probable effect of

her conduct would be to obstruct or impede the official proceeding; and

4. The defendant acted corruptly.

The government further alleges that the defendant aided and abetted others in committing

obstruction of an official proceeding. To satisfy its burden of proof in proving that the defendant

Page 1 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 12

aided and abetted others in committing this offense, the government must prove the following

beyond a reasonable doubt:

l.

we

Others committed obstruction of an official proceeding by committing each of the
elements of the offense charged;

The defendant knew that obstruction of an official proceeding was going to be
committed or was being committed by others;

The defendant performed an act or acts in furtherance of the offense;

The defendant knowingly performed that act or acts for the purpose of aiding, assisting,
soliciting, facilitating, or encouraging others in committing the offense of obstruction
of an official proceeding; and

The defendant did that act or acts with the intent that others commit the offense of an

obstruction of an official proceeding.

As to Count 3 of the indictment, the essential elements of theft of government property, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, are as follows:

1.

An unidentified male took one laptop computer located in the offices of a member of
the U.S. Congress;

The laptop computer belonged to the United States at the time it was taken;

When the unidentified male took the laptop computer he intended to deprive, without
right, the owner of the use or benefit of the laptop computer; and

The laptop computer taken had a value of less than $1,000.

The government alleges that the defendant aided and abetted others in theft of government

property. To satisfy its burden of proof in proving that the defendant aided and abetted others in

committing this offense, the government must prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt:

Page 2 of 12
Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 3 of 12

1. An unidentified male committed theft of government property by committing each of
the elements of the offense charged;

2. The defendant knew that theft of government property was going to be committed or
was being committed by the unidentified male;

3. The defendant performed an act or acts in furtherance of the offense;

4. The defendant knowingly performed that act or acts for the purpose of aiding, assisting,
soliciting, facilitating, or encouraging the unidentified male in committing the theft of
government property; and

5. The defendant did that act or acts with the intent that the unidentified male commit the
offense of theft of government property.

I. Statement of Offense
The Attack at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021

i. The U.S. Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C., is
secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include
permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only
authorized people with appropriate identification are allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol.

a. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was closed to members
of the public.

3. On January 6, 2021, a joint session of the United States Congress convened at the
United States Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C. During the joint
session, elected members of the United States House of Representatives and the United States
Senate were meeting in separate chambers of the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of

the Electoral College of the 2020 Presidential Election, which had taken place on November 3,

Page 3 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 4 of 12

2020. The joint session began at approximately 1:00 p.m. Shortly thereafter, by approximately
1:30 p.m., the House and Senate adjourned to separate chambers to resolve a particular objection.
Vice President Mike Pence was present and presiding, first in the joint session, and then in the
Senate chamber.

4, As the proceedings continued in both the House and the Senate, and with Vice
President Pence present and presiding over the Senate, a large crowd gathered outside the U.S.
Capitol. As noted above, temporary and permanent barricades were in place around the exterior
of the U.S. Capitol building, and U.S. Capitol Police were present and attempting to keep the
crowd away from the Capitol building and the proceedings underway inside.

5. At approximately 2:00 p.m., certain individuals in the crowd forced their way
through, up, and over the barricades, and officers of the U.S. Capitol Police, and the crowd
advanced to the exterior facade of the building. The crowd was not lawfully authorized to enter
or remain in the building and, prior to entering the building, no members of the crowd submitted
to security screenings or weapons checks by U.S. Capitol Police Officers or other authorized
security officials.

6. At such time, the certification proceedings were still underway and the exterior
doors and windows of the U.S. Capitol were locked or otherwise secured. Members of the U.S.
Capitol Police attempted to maintain order and keep the crowd from entering the Capitol; however,
shortly after 2:00 p.m., individuals in the crowd forced entry into the U.S. Capitol, including by
breaking windows and by assaulting members of law enforcement, as others in the crowd
encouraged and assisted those acts. The riot resulted in substantial damage to the U.S. Capitol,

requiring the expenditure of more than $2.8 million dollars for repairs.

Page 4 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 5 of 12

ay Shortly thereafter, at approximately 2:20 p.m., members of the United States House
of Representatives and United States Senate, including the President of the Senate, Vice President
Pence, were instructed to—and did—evacuate the chambers. Accordingly, all proceedings of the
United States Congress, including the joint session, were effectively suspended until shortly after
8:00 p.m. the same day. In light of the dangerous circumstances caused by the unlawful entry to
the U.S. Capitol, including the danger posed by individuals who had entered the U.S. Capitol
without any security screening or weapons check, Congressional proceedings could not resume
until after every unauthorized occupant had left the U.S. Capitol, and the building had been
confirmed secured. The proceedings resumed at approximately 8:00 p.m. after the building had
been secured. Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was
evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the session resumed.

Maryann Mooney-Rondon’s Participation in the January 6, 2021, Capitol Riot

8. The defendant, MARYANN MOONEY-RONDON, lives in Watertown, New
York. On January 5, 2021, defendant traveled from Watertown to Virginia, via automobile, with
her son and co-defendant, RAFAEL RONDON. The purpose of the defendant’s trip to the
Washington, D.C., area was to attend a political rally dubbed “Stop the Steal” in protest of
Congress’ certification of the Electoral College vote.

9, On or about January 6, 2021, MOONEY-RONDON rode the Metro into D.C.
MOONEY-RONDON and RONDON attended the “Stop the Steal” rally and then marched with
other protestors to the U.S. Capitol.

10. At approximately 2:23 p.m., defendant MOONEY-RONDON entered the U.S.

Capitol through the breached Senate Wing Door with RONDON, as shown in Exhibit 1.

Page 5 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 6 of 12



Still from Exhibit 1 -MOONEY-RONDON enters the Capitol building

11. MOQONEY-RONDON and RONDON proceeded together through the Crypt on the
first floor and up to the second floor of the U.S. Capitol. At approximately 2:32 p.m., MOONEY-
RONDON and RONDON entered the office suite of the Speaker of the House of Representatives,
near Room H227.

12. At approximately 2:33 p.m., MOONEY-RONDON and RONDON entered the
Speaker of the House of Representative’s Conference Room, H230. Therein, MOONEY-
RONDON and RONDON encouraged an unidentified male to steal a laptop computer located on
the Conference Room table, as shown in Exhibit 2. Referring to the laptop computer, MOONEY-

RONDON told the unidentified male, “It would be interesting to see what’s on that hard drive.”

Page 6 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 7 of 12



Still from Exhibit 2—MOONEY-RONDON speaking to unidentified male with laptop computer
13. | MOONEY-RONDON then assisted in the theft by providing her gloves to the
unidentified male to retrieve the laptop computer without leaving fingerprint evidence on the

device, as shown in Exhibit 3. The unidentified male then took the laptop computer.



Sall from Exhibit 3 MOONEY-RONDON provides gloves to unidentified male

Page 7 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 8 of 12

14. At approximately 2:42 p.m., MOONEY-RONDON and RONDON entered the

Senate Gallery, which overlooks the Senate Floor, as shown in Exhibit 4.



Exhibit 4- MOONEY-RONDON in the Senate Gallery

15. MOONEY-RONDON and RONDON each took an ILC Dover SCape CBRN30
escape hood with satchel (a black pouch with an orange strap), which is a filtering respiratory
protective device maintained in the U.S. Capitol for Members of Congress and staff.

16. At approximately 2:52 p.m., MOONEY-RONDON and RONDON exited the U.S.
Capitol via the Rotunda steps onto the East Front. At that time, RONDON was wearing the escape

hood on his head and MOONEY-RONDON was wearing an escape hood satchel across her chest,

as shown in Exhibit 5.

Page 8 of 12
Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 9 of 12



Exhibit 5 - MOONEY-RONDON wearing emergency escape hood satchel

17. On June 29, 2021, the FBI executed a search warrant at MOONEY-RONDON’s
residence in Watertown, New York. During the residential search, two emergency escape hood
satchels that were taken from the U.S. Capitol were found.

18, During a voluntary interview with the FBI, MOONEY-RONDON acknowledged
entering the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, 2021. MOONEY-RONDON admitted she knew
prior to her entry that the Presidential election results were being certified inside the Capitol
building at that time. MOONEY-RONDON further advised that prior to her entry she saw police
officers with shields outside the Capitol and witnessed members of the crowd pushing against the
officers, and that she smelled tear gas.

19. MOONEY-RONDON admitted to traveling to Speaker of the House of
Representative’s Conference Room upon entering the Capitol building. MOONEY-RONDON
admitted to providing either her gloves or scarf to an unidentified male to assist in the theft of a
laptop computer. MOONEY-RONDON confirmed that her arm is shown in the above-referenced

still from Exhibit 3. MOONEY-RONDON stated that she saw “the gentleman that took the

Page 9 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 10 of 12

computer,” explaining further, “I’m pretty sure I saw [the unidentified male] put itin a backpack...
probably 100 percent.”

20. MOONEY-RONDON acknowledged traveling to the Senate Gallery. MOONEY-
RONDON admitted to stealing an emergency escape hood and satchel as she departed the Capitol
building.

21. MOONEY-RONDON knew at the time she entered the U.S. Capitol Building that
she did not have permission to enter the building. The defendant obstructed, influenced, and
impeded an official proceeding, that is, a proceeding before Congress, specifically, Congress’s
certification of the Electoral College vote as set out in the Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution
of the United States and 3 U.S.C. §§ 15-18. MOONEY-RONDON was aware of the ongoing
Congressional session on January 6, 2021, and that its purpose was to certify the results of the
election.

22. | Anunidentified male took a laptop computer located in the offices of a member of
the U.S. Congress, which property belonged to the United States at the time it was taken. When
the unidentified male took the laptop computer he intended to deprive, without right, the owner of

the use or benefit of the laptop computer. The laptop computer taken had a value of less than

$1,000.

23. MOONEY-RONDON knew that the theft of the laptop computer, which was
property of the United States, was going to be committed or was being committed by the
unidentified male. MOONEY-RONDON performed an act or acts in furtherance of the offense,
specifically, providing her gloves to the unknown male such that he would not leave fingerprint
evidence on the laptop computer. MOONEY-RONDON knowingly performed that act or acts for

the purpose of aiding, assisting, soliciting, facilitating, or encouraging the unidentified male in

Page 10 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 11 of 12

committing the theft of the laptop computer. MOONEY-RONDON did that act or acts with the

intent that the unidentified male commit the offense of theft of government property.

24. If the Court finds the existence of these facts beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant

stipulates that this evidence would establish each and every element of the charged offenses for Counts 1

and 3 of the Indictment. ECF No. 15.

By:

Respectfully submitted,

MATTHEW M. GRAVES
United States Attorney
D.C. Bar No. 481052

wr Whegdicen—

WILL N. WIDMAN

Trial Attorney, detailee

NC Bar No. 48158

1301 New York Avenue NW, 8th Floor
Washington, DC 20530

(202) 353-8611

Will. [email protected]



Page 11 of 12


Case 1:21-cr-00722-JMC Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 12 of 12

DEFENDANT’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I, MARYANN MOONEY-RONDON, have read the foregoing Statement of Facts for
Stipulated Trial, and I have discussed this proffer fully with my attorney, Peter Cooper, Esquire.
I fully understand this proffer, and I accept it without reservation. I do this voluntarily and of my

own free will. No threats have been made to me nor am J under the influence of anything that could
impede my ability to understand this proffer fully.

| tof
Date: N OA/ s 209 4 th. mea hc f bee
MARW ANN MOQNEY-RONDON

Defendant



ATTORNEY’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I have read every page of this Statement of Facts for Stipulated Trial with my client,
Maryann Mooney-Rondon, and fully discussed it with my client.

owe Li Mackiue __ {Up

PETER COQPER
Attomey for Defendant Mooney-Rondon

Page 12 of 12






Kind of hard to argue someone is not guilty when they openly admit multiple times to the charges/crime, huh?
ZRX1200 Offline
#250 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
Oh totally….

And ignore whatever they threatened her with to take this ^ because we’ve seen such a display of discretion in this farce.

I want to hear about your feelings on the McCarthyism in the 50’s….
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
6 Pages<123456>