America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

You can take it. Lol I yield the floor.

I been done with this thread.

Post #48 is all I had to say.

^

"If I Too much were to take it"?

Idk. SEE post #48. You asked for intent, I gave you the quote. Idk what else there is to say.

Jeebs, heard that cuz. We all have our own thoughts and opinions.

Article Ray posted: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/04/thomas-dilorenzo/palestinian-confederates/

A strange statement for Netanyahu to make. He is Jewish so he does not invoke biblical language, he would invoke Torah language. Also, Samuel 15:3 never mentions bible which would be an absurdity given that Samuel was Jewish. To the best of my recollection in 1546 the council of Trent issued the definitive answer on what books the bible should be made up of. The earlies books of the New Testament were written about 100 CE. The bible as we know it was not compiled until the 3rd and 4th centuries CE. So, the term bible would not have existed until this timeframe.

Perhaps you could find another source to establish intent as your first one seems inaccurate.

Yes

I’m pretty sure one can find the verbatim text of every version you mentioned on the internet. As far as YouTube is concerned I’m sure one can find videos of a narrator reading each of those versions as well.

😂

Imo what he did was make a veiled genocidal threat toward the Palestinians last October(not just Hamas), using the Old Testament of the bible as a historical reference, and precedence.

South Africa (and others?) took Israel to the Hague (International Court of Justice) over this.

Based on Netanyahu's statements, statements from his cabinet, the IDF, the ICJ court arguments, and conditions on the ground, I think the Israeli govt, at least at one point, intended (intent) to wipe the Palestinians out. Genocide.

I'd guess they walk that back a little now considering they got taken to the Hague and the world is paying more attention than they were last fall. I hope that's the case, but maybe not. Time will tell.

I mentioned something like that on page two, post #48. I said maybe it's just political rhetoric but it sounds pretty "genocidey" to me. I know you learn toward rhetoric and I lean toward intent on genocide. Only time will tell.

I base what I think on hundreds of years of military history. This wouldn't be the first genocide rodeo, nor the last.

NIV. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’” No mention of Bible is there?

NLT. Now go and completely destroy the entire Amalekite nation—men, women, children, babies, cattle, sheep, goats, camels, and donkeys.” No mention of the word Bible.

What is your point?

Did you read the article? You couldn't have. The author is saying "our bible". They're his words. Not from the bible. He said, and quoting "our Bible" then goes on to the Samuel quote.

Hively Post #2: "I simply do not support Israel's genocide of the Palestinians whatsoever, and I'm not a "far-left agitator and Islamist-sympathizing activist." Just a guy that doesn't enjoy seeing an entire group of people being wiped off of the earth."

That's what the last section of Deuteronomy 25 indeed says: "Therefore it shall be, when the Lord your God has given you rest from your enemies all around, in the land which the Lord your God is giving you to possess as an inheritance, that you will blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven."

If that's what you, Fenster, DMV, ZRX and Stogie think, then own it. Join up, strap up, go kill some women, children and Hamas. Kill em all. But on the other hand, spare me the "western enlightenment" and religious reformation speech.

I couldn't believe that's what Israel used as a defense. Bc it, too, called for "Amalek" to be wiped off the earth. Lol Holiday/museum quote or not...

Also, I mentioned all of that (post #2) before Ray posted the article with the Samuel quote. So, no matter which Amalek reference you think Netanyahu used, in this context (of war) they are both veiled genocidal threats, or as Jeebs argued, dangerous political rhetoric. And as I said, time will tell.

And for the record, ever since the Cbid Covid Wars, I'm not interested in your opinion about anything. I'm not interested in your opinion specifically, not everybody that disagreed with me about "Covid".

I don't like talking to you in general. If I want to know your opinion I'll ask Fenster. Why do you care, at all, what my opinion is on the happenings in the newest theater of WW3? I'm just a Qbert, remember?

You couldn't even wrap your mind around the fact that Thomas Di Lorenzo was the one that said "Our Bible", not Samuel and certainly not me. I think he was kinda trolling Bibi there or maybe it was a typo. I don't care either way.

I didn't even post the article, Ray did. Why don't you make a thread about blocking him for his thought crimes. Oh that's right, you already did.

This is an excellent summary and the details do matter. The nitty gritty details make a difference when we are talking about Netanyahu and if his intent is genocide. Not that you need my help with your comment. I guess I’m just saying thanks for telling me something I didn’t know.

1. "... Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima. Three days later, a Fat Man was dropped on Nagasaki. Over the next two to four months, the effects of the atomic bombings killed 90,000 to 146,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000 to 80,000 people in Nagasaki; roughly half occurred on the first day.

2. God was not always nice. He gave instructions to smite peoples, take lands with violence, allowed enslavement of, and wars against the Israelites. He meted harsh penalties for violation of his laws and orders, eg. Adam & Eve, every one who wasn't on Noah's Ark, Sodom and Gamora and instructions to Moses what to do to take the "promised land'; etc., etc.

3. A war wiping out the leadership of an enemy who vows destruction of a country and the killing of all its people; shoots thousands of missiles/rockets; and that also has recently attacked across the border with over 1,000 people killed and hundreds of others taken hostage- back into enemy territory for six months; has the right to route out its enemies' leadership and military and find the hostages as necessary to strengthen its border and reduce risk/chance of another outbreak of war for as long as possible. It is a defensive war to uphold/strengthen its border Such a war is JUST WAR IN MY OPINION.

It's up to Hamas to save its people from the calamity it caused to come down on them- before a more controlled, known to be oncoming, onslaught. They can resign, surrender, leave the enemy territory permanently, to save their people or risk death to too manyl.

3. As to "ask Fenster" you do not know much of my opinions.

ONE POINT: JEWS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NEW TESTAMENT IN ANY ASPECT OF RELIGION OR THEOLOGY.
We don't call anything the Old Testament for religious purpose.
Jews refer to Torah and Judaic interpretations. That's all.