opelmanta1900 wrote:You're a little all over the place cb...
First, you defend the ownership of slaves by past presidents under the banner of "everyone was doing it"...
Then you accuse me of defending trump...
The you lambast trump as the worst president ever because he shook hands with a bad guy (only bad if you don't subscribe to the "everybody's doing it" excuse you've already leaned on)...
Then you accuse me of being duped by a rigged system in which both sides of the same coin are equally evil...
Then you go on to say the trump side of the coin is much more evil than the other side...
"Sorry straw man but no courage granted here. I guess it's back to the yellow brick road for you."
Are you straight up insane? Where did I DEFEND the ownership of slaves. Your bias has affected your reading comprehension. That's got to be the dumbest thing you've ever typed. I didn't defend it, I said it happened, and it happened everywhere, from the beginning of time up until this moment it has existed and still does. Let me get right on that whole breaking the laws of physics thing so I can travel back in time to yell at Jefferson and company. Bad slave owners BAD. You've got to be F'ing with me. You just have to.
You calling Kim Jong Un a "Bad Guy" is like saying Stalin and Hitler were just misunderstood. And it's not "just because he shook hands with a bad guy. You are deliberately GALACTICALLY oversimplifying my reasons. That was simply one reason I mentioned, out of MANY reasons of why I think he's the biggest goof this country with Russia's help, has ever played on itself. And that reason alone is enough for me. By casually calling Kim Jong Un a "bad guy" you just casually ignored generations of rape, torture, murder, slavery, and extortion on a global scale. The concentration and slave camp system in North Korea would make the worst Nazi ever born pause for a moment and rethink his position. That's who Trump ADMIRES and there are tons of people who think Trump is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Outrageously oversimplifying my position based off one statement is called setting up a straw man argument. It's the textbook definition of one.
I didn't accuse you of being duped by anyone, I didn't accuse you of anything. I specifically mentioned conservatives and liberals. Again reading comprehension is your friend here. The two sides of the coin are liberals and conservatives, I was quite clear, not Trump and not you. If you put yourself on one side or the other that's not my problem.
I even went out of my way to say this was not aimed at you personally and edited one comment because it could have been taken as being directed at you personally. I mentioned it in case anyone had read what I originally wrote and misunderstood what I was trying to say before I rewrote it. Again reading comprehension. I defended slavery, look at the balls on you. Pointing out that it exists is defending it now.... Jesus Christ on a pogo stick..... the best part is when you quoted me back to myself and thought you were being clever!
Best troll ever A++ would recommend to a friend.