Covfireman wrote:Now we have the po,ice state but it's oppressing the freedom of the ones it's supposed to protect and not stopping the ones it's supposed to. How many times AFTER an attack have we saw ' the FBI had assailant A under investigation ' or insert which ever alphabet agency you want in there .
With the technology available there's no excuse for not arresting every looters at these protests. Any looters who was recorded and is a convict could be matched with facial recognition software that even local governments can access. If want to be realistic why not run it against the NSA's mater list .
We can send The SSG after all the protesters and have them gangstalked.
Dude, I really would love to have a hit off the bong you're smoking.
Police state??? Do you even know what a police state is??? Obviously, not.
(Disclaimer: I'm a retired LEO/reserve LEO)
As far as facial recognition is concerned, you obviously have no idea about that technology's capability, or its limitations. It's pretty dammed hard to create an accurate profile from a masked face. One can create a profile of the parts exposed, but apparently you missed the part of having most of their faces concealed.
Suppose they were able to create a facial profile. What are they going to compare it to? If there is no face in a database to match it to, then you have nothing. I guess if we lived in a real police state we would be required to update the NSA photo database every time we forget to shave or grow a pimple.
Oh, perhaps you should spell check your posts. It least your asinine post won't look illiterate.
I would be nicer, but Frank was wondering if I were ok. It's important that I prove I'm not an imposter of I. Know what I mean?