America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 6 years ago by MACS. 71 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
piece of cake
frankj1 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
release the tapes...Comey lying or not?
done deal.

bet a dollar that Comey is right.

Let's get to it. release the tapes.
teedubbya Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
If he had taped the conversations he destroyed them already. You know comey isn't dumb enough to lie about it under oath even if you hate the guy.

My guess. No tapes. And if there ever were they are long gone.
MACS Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,921
I'm doubtful there are any tapes.

Also doubtful Comey can be trusted, either way. Not to say Trump's clean, just to say that a guy who straight ADMITS leaking to the public, while being charged with preventing same... is pretty suspect.
TMCTLT Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
MACS wrote:
I'm doubtful there are any tapes.

Also doubtful Comey can be trusted, either way. Not to say Trump's clean, just to say that a guy who straight ADMITS leaking to the public, while being charged with preventing same... is pretty suspect.



Agreed, the fact that the man could be manipulated by Loretta Lynch as acting Att. Gen. to use or change wording regarding the " INVESTIGATION of Clinton " to calling it " a matter " tells me and anyone else ALL they need to know about where his loyalties lie.
tailgater Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I like how Comey is a mind reader.

He previously stated that although Clinton's actions were illegal, that her INTENT wasn't.

Now he says that Trump's INTENT by saying "I expect loyalty" was to obstruct justice.



DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
We should water-board him.. Mad
Burner02 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,888
Presently, Comey is more about being the news than solving anything.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,634
tailgater wrote:
I like how Comey is a mind reader.

He previously stated that although Clinton's actions were illegal, that her INTENT wasn't.

Now he says that Trump's INTENT by saying "I expect loyalty" was to obstruct justice.






It's easy to see how Comey lost his job.

If he comes across like this in profile cases I bet his management style is swiss cheese too.

Heard he got a book deal. Nice payola.
Mr. Jones Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,483
#6 drafterx

+1 I AGREE

WATERBOARD "DODGE BALL GIGANTA"....

His SSG AGENTS VERBALLY THREATENED ME IN PUBLIC WITH KIDNAPPING, STROBELIGHT TORTURE, WATERBOARDING, ELECTRIC SHOCK TO MY BALLS, TYING MY ARMS AND HANGING ME UP FOR EIGHT HOURS..."

Since his AGENTS THREATENED ME WITH TORTURE....

I SAY WATER BOARD HIS LANKY AZZ,
BETTER BRING A HOSE...HE'S TO LONG FOR JUST ONE BUCKET.
delta1 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,832
The "tapes" are just another in a long list of Trump lies...

Events in the next few months, especially as the Mueller special investigation gets rolling, will provide a better opportunity to judge these two men...but we all know who will dispute findings that implicate Trump and his campaign and who will dispute those that exonerate him and his campaign...I will eat this page if there aren't some criminal charges brought against someone in Trump's campaign...

the congressional intelligence hearings are more of a sideshow, which is a shame because they really should be focusing on how extensive the Russian meddling in our election was, and measures needed to prevent future attacks...
teedubbya Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Neither is worthy of support or full throated defense. I just don't think Comey is lying under oath.
Speyside Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I think Comey interfered with the election more than the Russians did ( If they did ) and what he did is a fact. I think the Russians did interfere, but that is only my opinion, since nothing has been proven. His announcement that the email investigation was reopened was unprecedented and unacceptable. Ongoing investigations are not supposed to be public knowledge.
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Comey swayed votes by not calling Hillary's criminal investigation an investigation....... Just not enough... She lost.. Mellow
Mr. Jones Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,483
COMEY HAS W.A.Y.
BIGGER
WORRIES
THAN
THESE
TWO LATEST "charades"...

It's called
"COINTELPRO II CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS"
Late this year...

CAN YOU SAY...
MURDER ONE CHARGES???
That will stick like G.L.U.E.

HE BETTER HOP A PLANE TO A
NON-EXTRADITION ISLAND
BY SEPTEMBER...
DrafterX Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Who did he whack..?? Huh
dstieger Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
"bombshell".."vindication"...."noteworthy"....."historic"...."groundbreaking"...."revelation"

wtf? I musta been watching the wrong testimony....I saw nothing new said about nothing...everybody involved with this (FBI, administration, Russian 'influence' users...etc.) is totally slippery and incapable of actually saying anything demonstrative or verifiable...

I don't get it. It is clear to me that Russia may have tried to influence the election. No doubt not the first time. People 'close to Trump' probably talked to Russians. Everybody is going to avoid being totally forthcoming about any of it. BFD....let's get on to something important...please.

I greatly dislike Trump. And TBH, I couldn't care much less if Jared Kushner and Flynn went and blew Putin and begged him to f up the election. This is Washington....shady **** happens...it sucks, but there's little (NO?) chance that any of it was illegal, much less impeachable. The only ones that really believe that there was real collusion between Moscow and Trump also think the moon landing was faked...Let's move the **** on....
tailgater Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
dstieger wrote:
"bombshell".."vindication"...."noteworthy"....."historic"...."groundbreaking"...."revelation"

wtf? I musta been watching the wrong testimony....I saw nothing new said about nothing...everybody involved with this (FBI, administration, Russian 'influence' users...etc.) is totally slippery and incapable of actually saying anything demonstrative or verifiable...

I don't get it. It is clear to me that Russia may have tried to influence the election. No doubt not the first time. People 'close to Trump' probably talked to Russians. Everybody is going to avoid being totally forthcoming about any of it. BFD....let's get on to something important...please.

I greatly dislike Trump. And TBH, I couldn't care much less if Jared Kushner and Flynn went and blew Putin and begged him to f up the election. This is Washington....shady **** happens...it sucks, but there's little (NO?) chance that any of it was illegal, much less impeachable. The only ones that really believe that there was real collusion between Moscow and Trump also think the moon landing was faked...Let's move the **** on....


You obviously love Trump.
Stop defending him.

-liberal grasping at straws



frankj1 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
it won't be about election tampering.
I've been saying that for months.
dstieger Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
sorry....frank, I guess I haven't been listening. What IS the issue or problem that warrants this much 'attention'?



I just can't envision what 'there' is there....at least that there could be nearly enough 'there' there to warrant the sort of attention that is preventing progress on ....anything

Six months from now, I'd wager the only outcome will be that Trump lovers still love Trump...Trump haters will hate Trump....nobody gets prosecuted, charged...nothing sticky gets pinned on anybody...and we'll probably still be 'speculating' ....about what?
MACS Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,921
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/05/31/watch-john-sununu-destroys-cnn-over-their-russian-collusion-peddling-n2333500

John Sununu asks the same questions, Dave.
SteveS Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
The press is relentlessly pursuing this "story" ... the seem to be desperate for some "fire" to be discovered amid all their cries of "SMOKE, SMOKE" .... and Nancy Pelosi is quoted frequently on the subject as if she's got something worthwhile to say ... and NO one seems to care that Barry was indefatigable in his efforts to influence elections in Israel .. no chance Putin made more than a small fraction of that effort ...
tailgater Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
it won't be about election tampering.
I've been saying that for months.


You're in a small minority, Frank.

There is evidence to suggest some form of "tampering" and there is a suspicion that it points to Russia somehow.
So the left is doing their best to pin it on Trump.

Trump is a thin skinned narcissist. A poor combination of traits. And he likes to tweet first, think later. Another bad combo.
With these skills he very well may dig a hole he can't climb out of.

But the left can't wait for that.
They are 100% positive that SOMETHING is fishy. And it involved Russia. And the Election. Or not. But somehow it's Trump and he's guilty of it.
Whatever "it" is.

frankj1 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
OK, just a theory/hunch, but it was born when it became known that many who touch Trump (directly or not) also touched LOTS of money and biz connections that linked to Putin and Ukraine.

Around that time Trump accused Obama of wire tapping (or some such phrase) his building. (not quite right, but...see further down).

After that, there were denials of that happening, legal scholars explaining why it could not be done even by direct Presidential edict...followed by claims that The Donald was not a target.

So, I am good wif words, but not so good wif numbahs, but I did the math anyway and came up with this:

Trump was actually not the target of surveillance, but so many around him were that he was caught like a dolphin in a tuna net...people being watched had lots of contact/business/politics with him that tons of stuff...perhaps phone calls, conversations, maybe EMAILS (!), all sorts of stuff could have been incriminating against Trump because he was in on so many.

So, yes, he ended up being involved in lots of info gathering, but mostly due to the surveillance of his many possibly co-opted associates, not because he was the target of the investigation.Collateral damage as it were.

All this before he became elected. My concerns became not of election rigging, but of Russian influence gained/bought/blackmailed on U.S. Policy, beginning with but not ending the eroding confidence in the Democratic Process. A huge gain for Russia if they can make that happen.

Ironically, Trump originally said the election was rigged and would not accept the results when he thought he would lose! Certainly that casts doubt in a percentage of his supporters.

He talked of his admiration for Putin as a strong leader. Setting the stage for future moves?

He selected several people for positions and/or nominations for positions that shape U.S. policy...despite having been told of concerns that one or more of these picks were potentially in position to be "coerced" or blackmailed by Russia, more than one of whom who hid meetings and income derived from Russia.

I hope it all ends up like The Whitewater Investigation of insider info on a FAILED real estate deal that morphed into guys who cheated on their wives scolding the sitting President on infidelity.
But the potential stakes, and they are only potential, for real damage to us is greater than in the denial of oral sex.

Believe me or not, this is a connect the dots kind of thing for me. Despite my admitted liberal tendencies, I am rooting for the country to rally and avoid contentious conclusions, though many here seem to know that us libs are drooling in anticipation of this blowing up.

You'd be wrong. We love America too. That's why I hope my theory is wrong, but it just seems right to me...until a lot more info is released.

And it's kind of fun!

tailgater Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
OK, just a theory/hunch, but it was born when it became known that many who touch Trump (directly or not) also touched LOTS of money and biz connections that linked to Putin and Ukraine.

Around that time Trump accused Obama of wire tapping (or some such phrase) his building. (not quite right, but...see further down).

After that, there were denials of that happening, legal scholars explaining why it could not be done even by direct Presidential edict...followed by claims that The Donald was not a target.

So, I am good wif words, but not so good wif numbahs, but I did the math anyway and came up with this:

Trump was actually not the target of surveillance, but so many around him were that he was caught like a dolphin in a tuna net...people being watched had lots of contact/business/politics with him that tons of stuff...perhaps phone calls, conversations, maybe EMAILS (!), all sorts of stuff could have been incriminating against Trump because he was in on so many.

So, yes, he ended up being involved in lots of info gathering, but mostly due to the surveillance of his many possibly co-opted associates, not because he was the target of the investigation.Collateral damage as it were.

All this before he became elected. My concerns became not of election rigging, but of Russian influence gained/bought/blackmailed on U.S. Policy, beginning with but not ending the eroding confidence in the Democratic Process. A huge gain for Russia if they can make that happen.

Ironically, Trump originally said the election was rigged and would not accept the results when he thought he would lose! Certainly that casts doubt in a percentage of his supporters.

He talked of his admiration for Putin as a strong leader. Setting the stage for future moves?

He selected several people for positions and/or nominations for positions that shape U.S. policy...despite having been told of concerns that one or more of these picks were potentially in position to be "coerced" or blackmailed by Russia, more than one of whom who hid meetings and income derived from Russia.

I hope it all ends up like The Whitewater Investigation of insider info on a FAILED real estate deal that morphed into guys who cheated on their wives scolding the sitting President on infidelity.
But the potential stakes, and they are only potential, for real damage to us is greater than in the denial of oral sex.

Believe me or not, this is a connect the dots kind of thing for me. Despite my admitted liberal tendencies, I am rooting for the country to rally and avoid contentious conclusions, though many here seem to know that us libs are drooling in anticipation of this blowing up.

You'd be wrong. We love America too. That's why I hope my theory is wrong, but it just seems right to me...until a lot more info is released.

And it's kind of fun!



I like it.
But I disagree on certain key aspects.

Let's say you're correct. Trump was surveyed collaterally. So is it Russia or the US intelligence who will blackmail him?
Let's say the Russians did have dirt. So what? Anything short of murder or drowning puppy dogs won't matter. Literally won't matter. Nobody thinks he's dealing arms, so what are we honestly talking about? Insider trading (gasp!).
What kind of dirt could they realistically have?
And remember: without even knowing what kind of dirt, the left is already frothing

Or let's say the guys he's surrounded by were Russian lackies. So what? I love how Trump gets ridiculed when people thought he'd hire unqualified schmucks. But when he hires people with foreign connections he's now in danger of being an insider? In cahoots?

I know Frankie bag-a-donuts loves America.
But the liberal media would rather have a sensational alternative fact headline then a boring actual truth.




DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Your memory seems intact.. but the investigations need to expand more into who ordered the surveillance. There was abuse of power or just plain ole breaking da law... The surveillance is supposed to only happen to foreigners on foreign soil... Anything they learned shouldn't be admissible if it ever went to court... And those who broke the rules should be punished... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
the blackmail thing came up recently from what's her name,..not Trump who would be susceptible, but those great expert advisers with "foreign connections" that he relies on due to his total lack of international stuff.

The Russians are just looking for more ways in to exert more influence.

Even the most ardent supporter has to admit he sure has an unusual circle of friends with ties and obligations to Mother Russia.

And we never went to the moon. Just thought I'd toss that in there.
DrafterX Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
So is everyone the Russian ambassador meets under investigation now..?? How about the Cuban ambassador..?? Obama sure did them a lot of favors... Mellow
MACS Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,921
Wait... so now you're saying it's not quite a piece of cake?
DrafterX Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
I never got my piece of cake.. Mad
frankj1 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
DrafterX wrote:
So is everyone the Russian ambassador meets under investigation now..?? How about the Cuban ambassador..?? Obama sure did them a lot of favors... Mellow

ambassadors, businessmen, Ukrainians with Putin support, and all led to paydays...most undisclosed.
frankj1 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
MACS wrote:
Wait... so now you're saying it's not quite a piece of cake?

well, as for the OP, the tapes would end speculation over who to believe what was said in private...but you almost got me!
frankj1 Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
DrafterX wrote:
I never got my piece of cake.. Mad

in typical lib fashion, i'll share mine with ya.
frankj1 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
and my surplus cheese.
frankj1 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
and my extra phones...
SteveS Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
frankj1 wrote:
in typical lib fashion, i'll share mine with ya.


You sharing what YOU have with someone else isn't "lib fashion", Frank ... libs want to share what I have with someone else
DrafterX Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
I appreciate it Frank.... just bought a new phone tho... ThumpUp
frankj1 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,293
SteveS wrote:
You sharing what YOU have with someone else isn't "lib fashion", Frank ... libs want to share what I have with someone else

hmmm, what ya got?
tailgater Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
hmmm, what ya got?


Don't bother. He gave it to me.
And Pedro.
dstieger Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Ask your doctor about Trobicin
DrafterX Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
I heard he was banned... Mellow
MACS Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,921
frankj1 wrote:
in typical lib fashion, i'll share mine with ya.


I don't have any issues with sharing. In fact, I am charitable, a good tipper, and I enjoy sharing not only cigars with friends but also good barbecue. I enjoy helping people.

However... I take issue with the 'redistribution of wealth', as it is not voluntary, and the government should never, ever be in the business of 'charity'. You have to see how that could be construed as 'buying votes', right? Because it is.
ZRX1200 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,683
https://downtrend.com/71superb/nancy-pelosi-says-letting-people-keep-money-they-earn-is-stealing
ZRX1200 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,683
And I believe the "tapes" were a ruse to call Comey's bluff, and get the MSM chasing their tails.

He plays them like a dislexic fiddle.
DrafterX Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
prolly true about the tape thing... otherwise there's no telling what he woulda said... he still wasn't completely honest according to Trump tho...
I'm starting to question him all around.. if he's a habitual leaker he just may be a habitual liar also... Mellow
SteveS Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
DrafterX wrote:
I'm starting to question him all around.. if he's a habitual leaker he just may be a habitual liar also


At best, he's an habitual blunderer ... sorta like having Inspector Clouseau as the FBI director ...
DrafterX Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Clouseau woulda been relatively harmless... Starting to sound like Comey was out for blood of both sides... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And yet Trump is not a habitual liar (and leaker for that matter).
DrafterX Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
what lies..?? it's not that I don't believe he's been lying.. I just don't know about what.... Confused
teedubbya Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
There are several examples out there. It's not hard to find.
DrafterX Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
on real news sites or fake ones..?? Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>