America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 15 months ago by frankj1. 25 replies replies.
“Forget the guns……..let’s go after the bullets!”
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
KingoftheCove Offline
#1 Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2023, 3:57 PM EST
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,645
The Dems realize going after guns is gonna be very difficult.

But taxing the chit out of ammunition, and requiring reporting on bulk purchases, and eliminating online ammo sales?
That may just work!!



(gaddam they are fuggin dumb)
ZRX1200 Offline
#2 Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2023, 3:58 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
I think you spelled “They care about you more than you do” wrong Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#3 Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2023, 7:30 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
I thought this was gonna be about cannoli recipes
Ram27 Offline
#4 Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2023, 7:41 PM EST
Joined: 04-30-2005
Posts: 49,059
Leave the gun 🔫 take the cannoli's....
dkeage Offline
#5 Posted: Thu, Feb 23 2023, 7:48 PM EST
Joined: 03-05-2004
Posts: 15,156
Ram27 wrote:
Leave the gun 🔫 take the cannoli's....

Applause
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 7:29 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
KingoftheCove wrote:
The Dems realize going after guns is gonna be very difficult.

But taxing the chit out of ammunition, and requiring reporting on bulk purchases, and eliminating online ammo sales?
That may just work!!



(gaddam they are fuggin dumb)



I don't know what part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" they have a problem with. Bless their tiny little hatred filled hearts.
Gene363 Offline
#7 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 9:21 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I don't know what part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" they have a problem with. Bless their tiny little hatred filled hearts.


True, and so-called "reasonable gun control" is just another step on the road to making all firearms illegal. Unfortunately, there are too many sheep that believe it will make them safe.


PS: This topic probably belongs in the Politics Forum.
tonygraz Offline
#8 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 9:31 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,292
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State....

If you are not in a well regulated Militia or such is not necessary then no guns !

You can't just pick out the parts you like.
Mr. Jones Offline
#9 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 9:32 AM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,451
Anti-gunners are the WORST !!!

ITS A SECOND AMENDMENT R.I.G.H.T.

GIVE IT A REST...

GO BUG SOME OTHER LAWBIDDING CITIZENS...

LIKE SKATEBOARDERS AND SUCH...


LETS RAISE THE PRICES ON STARBUCKS "ANYTHING"...
OR ANY VEGAN ITEM FOR SALE...AND SEE HOW THEY LIKE IT?
ZRX1200 Offline
#10 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 10:35 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
Tony were all the militia….and please ignore why the amendment was written.

I’m gonna buy some bullets today now and write Tony’s name on the boxes. My two brothers and my best friend are gonna go shoot some scary guns tomorrow. Very scary ones with fully semi automatic clips.

Probably gonna grab some tannerite targets too
Stogie1020 Offline
#11 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 11:20 AM EST
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,379
ZRX1200 wrote:
with fully semi automatic clips

BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin

Cracked me up...
Sunoverbeach Offline
#12 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 11:22 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
tonygraz wrote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State....

If you are not in a well regulated Militia or such is not necessary then no guns !

You can't just pick out the parts you like.

And whom, in your opinion should do the regulating as you interpret it? A trustworthy gubmint agency like the AFT that redefines its definitions every couple of years? Because if you form an actual trained militia that doesn't have oversight, you will be labeled a terrorist organization.

I read an article on interpreting the "well regulated" term, and it was their assertion that it simply meant supplied. When the colonists chose to stand against Britain, they had people willing to fight, but not enough guns and ammo. That particular problem has been resolved. Let's not recreate it
HockeyDad Offline
#13 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 11:25 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Stogie1020 wrote:
BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin BigGrin

Cracked me up...


I was terrified by the notion of fully semi automatic clips.
8trackdisco Offline
#14 Posted: Fri, Feb 24 2023, 2:07 PM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,097
HockeyDad wrote:
I was terrified by the notion of fully semi automatic clips.


I'm more afraid of Alec Baldwin Guns. They go off just by holding them.
8trackdisco Offline
#15 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 10:59 AM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,097
If 3-D printers can make guns, can they also make bullets?
Sunoverbeach Offline
#16 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 11:50 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
You could but it's not gonna go bang
Brewha Offline
#17 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 12:15 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Sunoverbeach wrote:
And whom, in your opinion should do the regulating as you interpret it? A trustworthy gubmint agency like the AFT that redefines its definitions every couple of years? Because if you form an actual trained militia that doesn't have oversight, you will be labeled a terrorist organization.

I read an article on interpreting the "well regulated" term, and it was their assertion that it simply meant supplied. When the colonists chose to stand against Britain, they had people willing to fight, but not enough guns and ammo. That particular problem has been resolved. Let's not recreate it

I think legally, the term “well regulated” means that they get lot of fiber.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#18 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 12:37 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
Then we'd need to discuss the finer points of defining regulated vs regular
RayR Offline
#19 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 1:00 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,928
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Then we'd need to discuss the finer points of defining regulated vs regular


Don't listen to Brewha. He's full of 💩
"Regulated" was defined in 18th Century English as "to make regular", in other words, "consistent and properly
operated”. "Regulated" had nothing to do with additional modern definitions like politicians and bureaucrats dicktating and barking orders on a piece of paper.

Some people like to butcher words, ignoring what they meant at the time they were used, it's a tool they use to sell their presentist propaganda to mushheads.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#20 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 2:56 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
Yeah, that's what I was getting at in my response to Tony, but Brew opted to head down a facetious tangent. And you know I loves me a facetious tangent
Brewha Offline
#21 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 4:00 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Then we'd need to discuss the finer points of defining regulated vs regular

I read about it in the library in incontinence….
RayR Offline
#22 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 4:10 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,928
Brewha wrote:
I read about it in the library in incontinence….


So you do know they have special underwear for bowel incontinence? 💩 Right?
Sunoverbeach Offline
#23 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 4:31 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,675
Happens a lot on the interwebs. People just can't seem to hold their chit in
RayR Offline
#24 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 4:41 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,928
Sunoverbeach wrote:
Happens a lot on the interwebs. People just can't seem to hold their chit in


ThumpUp And that's no 💩.
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted: Sat, Feb 25 2023, 8:34 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
well, depends.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top