America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 19 years ago by RICKAMAVEN. 4 replies replies.
And the verdict is ...
SteveS Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
The Scott Peterson case was given to the jury this afternoon. Given what you know of the case and the following report from CNN, what verdict do you think the jury will bring in? And, how long will they deliberate before returning that verdict?

=======================================================

REDWOOD CITY, California (AP) -- Jurors began deliberating the fate of Scott Peterson on Wednesday, more than five months after testimony began in the murder of his wife and her fetus.

Judge Alfred A. Delucchi sent the panelists off with lunch into the jury room after about 45 minutes of instructions. They met for four hours before retiring for the day.

The jury must decide whether Peterson killed his pregnant wife and dumped her body in San Francisco Bay, or was merely a straying husband who was framed. The judge plans to keep the jury sequestered until it reaches a verdict.

In a brief rebuttal to the defense closing arguments, prosecutor Rick Distaso advised jurors not to find reasonable doubt in an unreasonable interpretation of evidence.

"It's just not reasonable that anyone put that body in the bay to frame him. If it's not reasonable, you must reject it," Distaso said.

Winding up their case earlier in the day, defense lawyers lashed out at the notion that Laci Peterson's fetus died in her womb. Lawyer Mark Geragos reminded jurors that authorities never found the placenta or the fetus' umbilical cord, leaving little evidence to determine whether the male fetus was born alive and killed later.

If the fetus died later, Geragos said, "it's not Scott Peterson who did that."

Prosecutors claim Peterson, a fertilizer salesman who was having an affair, strangled or smothered his 27-year-old wife on Dec. 23 or 24, 2002, then dumped her weighted body into the bay. Her badly decomposed body and that of the fetus washed ashore four months later. Geragos claims someone else abducted and killed the Modesto substitute teacher.

Jurors have two choices should they decide to convict -- first-degree murder, carrying a possible death sentence or life without parole, and second-degree murder, carrying two sentences of 15 years to life.

"First-degree murder you need two things, expressed malice and intent to kill and premeditation," Delucchi told jurors. Second degree, he said, means Peterson killed them but didn't plan it. The judge added the lesser charge after finding there was ample evidence to support a case that did not involve premeditation.
jackconrad Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
No concrete evidence means no conviction.
JonR Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Yo SteveS:

He has been tried in kookafornia, he will walk free. The DAs in kookafornia start writing their books one third into the trial, half way thru the trial their making their picture deals and talk show deals, and at the end of the trial they quit their jobs and get their own TV shows. We have seen this soooooooo many times.


JonR

drjothen Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-17-2003
Posts: 319
One thing that people have not considered is the "OJ Factor". People look at these cases much differently than they did previously.

There is a chance at a hung jury but I think that they will ultimately convict based more on the fact he is a cad rather than true physical evidence.

DRJ
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
drjothen

cool word "cad." i think you are correct about the outcome.
Users browsing this topic
Guest