America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 months ago by 8trackdisco. 151 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
College Football Playoffs
Burner02 Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
I wonder if Liberty is wishing that Bo Nix would have opted out. Close at the end of the first quarter. Not so close at half, Ducks 31-6.
Burner02 Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Georgia Bulldogs HC Kirby Smart Calls Out Current Landscape of College Football After 63-3 Orange Bowl Victory; ‘It Needs to be Fixed’

The Georgia Bulldogs smashed the Florida State Seminoles in the Orange Bowl last night, 63-3. The Seminoles were without 29 scholarship players due to opt-outs and the transfer portal, resulting in 146 yards from scrimmage in a blowout loss. Despite his team blowing the doors off the Seminoles, Georgia head coach Kirby Smart was not too pleased with the product on the field.

Georgia Bulldogs head coach Kirby Smart took the podium postgame, discussing how opt-outs and the new NCAA transfer portal rules resulted in the lopsided win.

“People need to see what happened tonight, and they need to fix this,” said Smart. The Seminoles played down 29 scholarship players, including the star wide receiver duo of Johnny Wilson and Keon Coleman. They also took the field with their third-string quarterback, Brock Glenn. Starter Jordan Travis suffered a gruesome leg injury late in the season, while backup Tate Rodemaker entered the transfer portal less than a week before the Orange Bowl.

Smart continued, “It needs to be fixed. It’s very unfortunate that they have a good football team and a good football program, and they’re in the position they’re in.”
Ezoic

The College Football Playoff committee made an unprecedented move this postseason, omitting the Seminoles from the CFP despite going undefeated and winning the ACC Championship. Florida State became the first Power-Five team in the history of the CFP to miss out on the four-team playoff field after finishing the season without a loss and taking home their conference title. Instead, the committee picked a pair of one-loss teams, the Texas Longhorns and the Alabama Crimson Tide, as the last two teams to make the dance.
“We had our guys, and they didn’t have their guys. College football has to decide what they want. I know things are changing. But there’s still going to be bowl games outside of those. People need to decide what they want and what they want to get out of it because it’s really unfortunate for those kids on that sideline that had to play in that game and didn’t have their full arsenal. And it affected the game.”

There are 43 bowl games, starting with the Myrtle Beach Bowl in mid-December and ending with the College Football Playoff National Championship. However, opt-outs and the transfer portal have decimated squads, especially those outside the CFP. Over 2,000 FBS college football players have entered the transfer portal during the current cycle.

He is not wrong. Personally, I would like to see the transfer portal capped at one transfer per player career.

Palama Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,717
The barn doors have been opened too long and I don’t see them limiting a player to only one transfer. Not talking

However, I can see (…hope…) that they change the rule to having to sit out a year after your 2nd transfer.

Nonetheless, as we can probably guess, any form of restriction(s) will result in a lawsuit(s). Brick wall
Burner02 Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Palama wrote:
The barn doors have been opened too long and I don’t see them limiting a player to only one transfer. Not talking

However, I can see (…hope…) that they change the rule to having to sit out a year after your 2nd transfer.

Nonetheless, as we can probably guess, any form of restriction(s) will result in a lawsuit(s). Brick wall


I had not thought of that but the one year sit might deter some.
8trackdisco Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Good game so far.
Cheering for Michigan, bet Bama.
Michigan defense is in the building,

Milroe to Bond for the first time in 27 football minutes. Maybe he's warming up.
Burner02 Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
UM's D line is doing better than I expected.
Palama Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,717
I know some / many of you will disagree but I LOVE a good defensive game. Some may call it boring but I say there's more excitement watching a game that may turn at any moment than a scoring fest with lead changes every other minute.
dkeage Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2004
Posts: 15,155
I prayed for a meteor, but god must have been busy….
rfenst Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
I have been scarred for Michigan since I learned they were playing Alabama. And, Now they are down. Hope their reputation of being a "fourth-quarter team" comes alive.
8trackdisco Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Should have known a Bama RB named after a failed Union Civil War general would tilt the scales against the blue uniformed men from the North.
dkeage Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2004
Posts: 15,155
Georgia is like……HELLO
Palama Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,717
Overtime!
rfenst Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
Palama wrote:
Overtime!

Yes!
M is still alive...
8trackdisco Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Good game, but either of these teams would have been rolled by FSU. Whistle
Palama Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,717
rfenst wrote:
Yes!
M is still alive...


I've never liked the college OT rule when it was first introduced but at the same time, didn't really care for the NFL process either.
8trackdisco Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
……… exhale.
Burner02 Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Palama wrote:
I know some / many of you will disagree but I LOVE a good defensive game. Some may call it boring but I say there's more excitement watching a game that may turn at any moment than a scoring fest with lead changes every other minute.


I totally agree.

UM turned out to be better than I thought and UA not as good as I thought. UM exposed UA's pass blocking. UA was more in control when they were going with the ground game..

Better team won.
HockeyDad Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
8trackdisco wrote:
Good game, but either of these teams would have been rolled by FSU. Whistle



I completely agree. At least Alabama is gone.
rfenst Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
8trackdisco wrote:
Good game, but either of these teams would have been rolled by FSU. Whistle

Bunch of crybabies.
Abrignac Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
8trackdisco wrote:
That “Nothing conference” had a winning record against SEC teams.
Guess that makes the SEC less than nothing.


Really? All but 2 of those wins came against teams with losing records. If I were inclined I’d take the time to compare the two conferences SOS and other pertinent stats, but I’m pretty sure the ACC wouldn’t measure up. There’s a reason they are the undisputed #5 Power 5 Conference.

FWIW,

The 14 member SEC has 6 teams in the final Top 25 CFP rankings.
#’s 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 25

The 14 member ACC has 3.
#’s 4, 16, 19

ZRX1200 Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Let’s go Huskies
Abrignac Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
Not sure it would have affected the outcome, but Washington has gotten away with 3-4 late hits out of bounds.
Abrignac Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
Pretty bonehead play calling by Washington on their last possession. Should have kneeled on it 3 plays in a row then punted. If Texas had a quarterback that was just marginally more accurate they would have won
Abrignac Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
Congrats to Michigan and Washington.
ZRX1200 Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
What conference does Texas play in?
MACS Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,809
Glad Michigan pulled it off.

Wasn't much interested in the second game, but I am rooting for Penix Jr. now. That kid has been through some injuries and setbacks. Might be his destiny to hoist that trophy.

Good luck to him.
Abrignac Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
I’m thinking Michigan is going to win the CFP. I believe it’s going to come down to who can control the line on both sides of the ball. They did a much better job against a more physical team than Washington. We shall see. Either way I don’t expect a high scoring game.

Michigan 17 - Washington 13
ZRX1200 Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
They handled Oregon twice. And the Ducks have more than one Day 1 draft pick on both sides of the ball.
Palama Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,717
Nephew-in-law is a UW graduate and man, was he NERVOUS towards the end of the game! Normally a quiet guy, he was extra quiet (…if that’s possible…) on the last Texas drive. After the last pass fell incomplete, he let out a sigh of relief and just smiled. We immediately asked if he was gonna try to go to the Championship game. He’s a doctor (…as well as his wife…) so money is not really a concern but appointments will have to be canceled as well as making last-minute travel and lodging arrangements so probably not in the cards.

With that being said, I can see UM dominating both lines of scrimmage and that probably be the key to the game. The “Big Uglies” are almost always unsung but can’t win games without them.
MACS Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,809
ZRX1200 wrote:
They handled Oregon twice. And the Ducks have more than one Day 1 draft pick on both sides of the ball.


And didn't their O-line win the award for being the best all year?
Abrignac Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
ZRX1200 wrote:
They handled Oregon twice. And the Ducks have more than one Day 1 draft pick on both sides of the ball.


Not sure I’d compare Oregon to Michigan. But that’s just my opinion. Having a couple potential Day 1 draftees also is t a measure of a team’s prowess. Draft history is full of Day 1 draftees who came from chitty teams.

I don’t think Oregon’s defensive line is comparable to Michigan’s. My guess is Phenix is going to spend quite a bit of time running for his life.
ZRX1200 Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Oregon isn’t a chitty team….and they’re draft picks played in the bowl game, that’s what I’d call high character in this day and age. But hey what don’t know I’m not a SEC ball washer.
Abrignac Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
ZRX1200 wrote:
Oregon isn’t a chitty team….and they’re draft picks played in the bowl game, that’s what I’d call high character in this day and age. But hey what don’t know I’m not a SEC ball washer.


Never said Oregon was chitty. Just saying that having high draftees on a team doesn’t imply the quality of a team. Also, I’m pretty sure they don’t give trophies for character so that’s irrelevant.

FWIW:
The following hasn’t been updated in 9 years so I’m curious as to what the current stats are.
SEC vs. ACC: 290-144-10
SEC vs. Big 12: 83-67-6
SEC vs. Big Ten: 83-57-2
SEC vs. Pac-12: 68-40-5
SEC vs. AAC: 8-3
SEC vs. Big East: 25-29
SEC vs. C-USA: 121-23
SEC vs. Independents: 624-288-21
SEC vs. MAC: 83-13
SEC vs. MWC: 14-7
SEC vs. SWC: 197-141-17
SEC vs. Sun Belt: 117-7
SEC vs. WAC: 71-11
8trackdisco Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Abrignac wrote:
Really? All but 2 of those wins came against teams with losing records. If I were inclined I’d take the time to compare the two conferences SOS and other pertinent stats, but I’m pretty sure the ACC wouldn’t measure up. There’s a reason they are the undisputed #5 Power 5 Conference.

FWIW,

The 14 member SEC has 6 teams in the final Top 25 CFP rankings.
#’s 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 25

The 14 member ACC has 3.
#’s 4, 16, 19



Now that Bama lost, they should get to play in the championship game.
The stats don’t support this, but it would be a “better game”.
Fill the room with a bunch of fat good ole’ boys gnawing on chicken gizzards and up to their backsides in back bacon, and make an addendum to the current rules!

Hurrumph,hurrumph! HURRUMPH! Give the commissioner a HURRUMPH!
delta1 Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
yeah...8 has something there...


the NCAA high poobahs need to act quickly and figger out a way to play Georgia vs Alabama in the Championship game...that's the game Amurica really wants!!!

Nobody wantsa see the Carpetbaggers play the Johnny come latelys...
ZRX1200 Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
They need a network for the cousin fornicators to watch that on.
Abrignac Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
What a bunch of jealous wusses. The SEC didn’t make the rules. The CLF committee did. Don’t blame the SEC if you don’t like the outcome. All 5 Power Conferences signed on to the bill of goods the CFP committee proposed. What, you’re all gonna pi$$ and moan because the SEC is and has for some time been the dominate NCAA football conference? Look at the stats. The SEC has a better win/loss record against all conferences except the Big East. Hate the game not the player.

Cousin fuckers? Really? But, hey that’s about the same as whining about character. It’s funny to watch someone deflect. I guess you have to find some way to minimize the fact that your team and its conference is second tier. I mean when a team isn’t consistently winning their fans have to figure out some way to make their team appear more relevant than they are. [shruggs shoulders]

Really doesn’t matter anymore anyway. Going to a 12 team playoff next year. Perhaps more teams down the road. Can’t wait to hear the future excuses and deflections when the SEC continues to dominate now that the wannabes get a shot but fall short.
rfenst Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
8trackdisco wrote:
Now that Bama lost, they should get to play in the championship game.
The stats don’t support this, but it would be a “better game”

That was the Championship game, but I'd like to see a do-over.
rfenst Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
Abrignac wrote:
Really doesn’t matter anymore anyway. Going to a 12 team playoff next year. Perhaps more teams down the road. Can’t wait to hear the future excuses and deflections when the SEC continues to dominate now that the wannabes get a shot but fall short.

No matter how many teams are in the hunt next season some teams will be on the cusp, but not make it.
That's just how it goes.
Abrignac Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
rfenst wrote:
No matter how many teams are in the hunt next season some teams will be on the cusp, but not make it.
That's just how it goes.


True. But, by including so many teams it’ll mute FSU type arguments. Probably also lead to some ridiculous blowouts of SEC wannabes.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
8trackdisco wrote:
Now that Bama lost, they should get to play in the championship game.
The stats don’t support this, but it would be a “better game”.
Fill the room with a bunch of fat good ole’ boys gnawing on chicken gizzards and up to their backsides in back bacon, and make an addendum to the current rules!

Hurrumph,hurrumph! HURRUMPH! Give the commissioner a HURRUMPH!



This checks out
Burner02 Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
8trackdisco wrote:
Now that Bama lost, they should get to play in the championship game.
The stats don’t support this, but it would be a “better game”.
Fill the room with a bunch of fat good ole’ boys gnawing on chicken gizzards and up to their backsides in back bacon, and make an addendum to the current rules!

Hurrumph,hurrumph! HURRUMPH! Give the commissioner a HURRUMPH!


For all you still butt hurt about the CFP committee and their exclusion of FSU, have you considered who is in charge of the CFP? Of course not, it must have been a SEC led conspiracy.

The Executive Director is Bill Hancock, U of Oklahoma, also a carry-over from the BCS days.

The 2023 President was Boo Corrigan, NC State AD. One would think that if he felt strong enough about FSU, they would have made the playoff.

A review of the committee members bios will reveal that there is one member with SEC ties and at least 2-3 including Corrigan with ACC ties. Doesn’t appear that the deck was stacked in the favor of the SEC.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
I dunno about all that but we were told all this crap would be solved with the "new" bowl structure.

Its worse.

Then again if people are offended an undefeated team doesn't get their due because they might lose need to check their vagina at the door. Losing is the 1st step to setting up a winning program. As Alabama showed, its also the dying gasp of a program on life support.
Burner02 Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Don't worry, the SEC is not going anywhere if recent history is any indicator.

BCS Championships
SEC - 9
ACC - 2
B10 - 1
B12 - 2
P12 - 2
Gave 1 to SEC and PAC 12 for dual Champions LSU & USC

CFP Championships
SEC - 6
ACC - 2
B10 - 1
B12 - 0
P12 - 0
Abrignac Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
Burner02 wrote:
For all you still butt hurt about the CFP committee and their exclusion of FSU, have you considered who is in charge of the CFP? Of course not, it must have been a SEC led conspiracy.

The Executive Director is Bill Hancock, U of Oklahoma, also a carry-over from the BCS days.

The 2023 President was Boo Corrigan, NC State AD. One would think that if he felt strong enough about FSU, they would have made the playoff.

A review of the committee members bios will reveal that there is one member with SEC ties and at least 2-3 including Corrigan with ACC ties. Doesn’t appear that the deck was stacked in the favor of the SEC.


Unfortunately this will go unnoticed by those who think that an SEC lead conspiracy instead of one with closer ACC ties kept poor, poor FSU out of the CFP.

In other news, this morning Brian Kelly called the entire LSU defensive coaching staff from the DC down into his office and fired them.
delta1 Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,807
o deer...who let the dawgs out...
8trackdisco Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Burner02 wrote:
For all you still butt hurt about the CFP committee and their exclusion of FSU, have you considered who is in charge of the CFP? Of course not, it must have been a SEC led conspiracy.

The Executive Director is Bill Hancock, U of Oklahoma, also a carry-over from the BCS days.

The 2023 President was Boo Corrigan, NC State AD. One would think that if he felt strong enough about FSU, they would have made the playoff.

A review of the committee members bios will reveal that there is one member with SEC ties and at least 2-3 including Corrigan with ACC ties. Doesn’t appear that the deck was stacked in the favor of the SEC.




To the 12 guys and 1 gal on the committee, how much would it take?
10% to each of them?
Maybe the SEC even kicked it up to ..... dare I say... 11?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xgx4k83zzc
8trackdisco Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Will be fun next year...

The field of 12 teams will be comprised of the six conference champions ranked highest by the selection committee (no minimum ranking requirement), plus the six highest-ranked other teams. The ranking of the teams will continue to be done by a selection committee whose size, composition, and method of selection will remain substantially unchanged from the current arrangement. The four highest-ranked conference champions will be seeded one through four and each will receive a first-round bye. The other eight teams will play in the first round with the higher seeds hosting the lower seeds either on campus or at other sites designated by the higher-seeded institution.

I would suppose they did such a great job this year, keep the same people in charge!

At least they are being "honest" about there being just four champions that matter.

https://collegefootballplayoff.com/news/2023/5/2/24-25-dates.aspx
8trackdisco Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Burner02 wrote:
Don't worry, the SEC is not going anywhere if recent history is any indicator.

BCS Championships
SEC - 9
ACC - 2
B10 - 1
B12 - 2
P12 - 2
Gave 1 to SEC and PAC 12 for dual Champions LSU & USC

CFP Championships
SEC - 6
ACC - 2
B10 - 1
B12 - 0
P12 - 0


How many of those ACC championships are complete frauds? You know- finished the season with a loss?
If any of them were undefeated, they wouldn't qualify.
Burner02 Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
8trackdisco wrote:
How many of those ACC championships are complete frauds? You know- finished the season with a loss?
If any of them were undefeated, they wouldn't qualify.



Simple fact of the matter is all of those ACC champs were far superior to this years FSU team at the end of the season.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>