America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 months ago by Abrignac. 127 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
It’s Time to Strike Back at Iran
frankj1 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
8trackdisco wrote:
Heck, I don’t remember them all. If you want, I can put together the list. They are the Cbid Exiles that meet up regularly on Zoom.

Leo from New Jersey
Victor80*
Teedubya (the most vicious and merciless attacks on anyone south of Victor80*).
Opie
Native American dude from Arizona that talked bitcoin. Ben, but don’t remember his handle.
The dude from Colorado (forget his handle).
Celtic Bomber

You visit the Exiles from time to time, Z. Who am I missing?
Rfenst… who else?

Anything from Covid, Politics, Woke, LGBT+.

I certainly took my fair share of swings but…. Wow.
If you figure something like 8% of the population is gay, lesbian, bi, or something more exotic for of sexual preference or dysfunction, and add to that people who post here all know of or care for someone who’s made that choice (if you believe it is a choice) or has been afflicted- and some are raising kids and going through this stuff, if my son was gay or my best friend was a tranny, I probably wouldn’t have stuck around either.

Live and let live. Or, purify Cbid by wiping out everyone who is the left of you!
When the single Lord of the Flies “wins”i please make sure to turn off the lights and close the door.

victor, tw, opie, bgz (ben from arizona), definitely not Democrats or liberals. I'm still in touch with them, some more than others.
Celtic (StePHen) is pretty much issue to issue. I'd say nonaffiliated.

I listed a few others that I believe may have left due to your points.

btw, great post(s) by you.

MCFA
Abrignac Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
Talking about adding to the national debt while Trump was in office:

While Trump was in office the national debt climbed by:
2018 - $779 billion budget deficit - First year Trump sponsored tax cut package affected budget
2019 - $984 billion budget deficit
2020 - $3.1 trillion budget deficit - Beginning of $3.1T in COVID-19 related additional supplemental spending.
2021 - $2.8 trillion budget deficit

During the Trump years
The National Debt increased by $7.67T.
Supplement COVID-19 spending was $3.1T
Difference between increase in National Debt & supplemental COVID-19 spending was $4.55T


The four COVID-19 related Spending Laws signed into law by Trump
* The Families First Coronavirus Response Act. It was signed into law on March 17, 2020. It’s estimated cost was $350B.
* The Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriation. It was signed into law on March 20, 2020. It’s estimated cost was $8.3B.
* The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). It was signed into law on March 27, 2020. It’s estimated cost was $2.2T.
* The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Divisions M&N). It was signed into law on December 27, 2020. It’s estimated cost was $900B.

At this point it should be fairly clear to see the two largest reasons that the national debt increased more while Trump was in office than during any other four-year Presidential term.

The primary reason was tax cuts without a corresponding decrease in government spending. That added $4.55 T to the national debt. The second reason was the $3.1T in supplemental COVID-19 spending.

As long as we continue to write checks for items, we cannot afford the debt will continue to spiral out of site. I'm no fan of paying any more taxes than is absolutely necessary. But, if we want to reduce the debt it's going to take a combination of sunsetting the Trump era tax cuts and significant across the board spending cuts.

I remember the first day of my first college Economics class. I walked in and sat down then looked at the dry erase board. There was one word written on it. It made no sense. That word was TANSTAAFL

By the time my first day in that class ended it became perfectly clear what that word meant.

T - There
A - Ain't
N - No
S - Such
T - Thing
A - As
A - A
F- Free
L - Lunch



RobertHively Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,893
frankj1 wrote:
victor, tw, opie, bgz (ben from arizona), definitely not Democrats or liberals. I'm still in touch with them, some more than others.
Celtic (StePHen) is pretty much issue to issue. I'd say nonaffiliated.

I listed a few others that I believe may have left due to your points.

btw, great post(s) by you.

MCFA


Most of those guys were some of the most trollin mofos to ever log on. I used to call em keyboard commandos.

It's weird to me that now they allegedly claim to be butthurt. Don't you think that's strange? What did I miss?

You ever hear from Izon?
ZRX1200 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Izon was a good egg.
TW was the fence post, not a lefty. Neither was Ben.
Yes Drywalldog! He gave as good as he got he struck me as more of a traditional D and not a modern version.
Yes PDX….he was a good egg too, we touched base a couple times and either he was busy or was afraid of the candy in my van the couple times I was up his way and had time.
Fiddler is another good egg.
Zombie is why I quit hopping on the zoom.
Tried to meet Robert when I was there scheduling didn’t work, same with DMV and I even texted him pics of my wide stance in the SLC airport stall. Thankfully LHD saved the day and asked me to meet him at the Honeypot bar to enjoy a petite corona.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
frankj1 wrote:
Perot ran in 1992

Clinton was the last POTUS to have a balanced budget...even a surplus IIRC.
In office '93 to 2001
Balanced budget from '98 to 2001

Last POTUS before him to do so was LBJ


So if you want a balanced budget even with a surplus you have to have a GOP House and Senate. Got it. After all, we do know the President only signs what's put in front of them...or vetoes.
HockeyDad Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
This thread has morphed from we need to bomb Iran now to how we’re gonna fix the national debt to how many lefties have fled from CigarBid.

1. War is a poor use of capital.

2. Neither Republicans or Democrats will ever even balance the federal budget until the threat of eminent financial collapse.

3. Do we actually know the list of demands from the vanquished lefties? Will they come back if we all agree to vote for Biden or Haley or is it more complicated where we have to agree to turn CigarBid into a leftie echo chamber to prevent it from becoming a rightie echo chamber? Do the righties have to leave? I’m just trying to get a handle on the starting point for negotiations. Do they want to bomb Iran?

I’m more than willing to lead the negotiations that could lead to their return. Standard consulting fees would apply. If they are all off on the Zoom meeting lamenting the horrors they experienced here I could login and perhaps have an exploratory conversation.
MACS Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
I will say this: Political disagreements are a fact of nature. It is nothing to get all worked up over, between cigar smoking brethren.

Two people who I consider good men and have had the absolute pleasure to spend time with do not see things my way... Frankie and Al (delta1). That's all well and good. We did not really discuss politics in person (much) and when Al and I have discussed it, we were both civil and respectful.

The anonymity of a computer screen tends to make some of us a little more snarky. Take it with a grain of salt. Beer
frankj1 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
MACS wrote:
I will say this: Political disagreements are a fact of nature. It is nothing to get all worked up over, between cigar smoking brethren.

Two people who I consider good men and have had the absolute pleasure to spend time with do not see things my way... Frankie and Al (delta1). That's all well and good. We did not really discuss politics in person (much) and when Al and I have discussed it, we were both civil and respectful.

The anonymity of a computer screen tends to make some of us a little more snarky. Take it with a grain of salt. Beer

I was prepared to skewer you whence we met, but you are so dreamy that I was instantly disarmed.
Still one of the most memorable days we have ever been treated to...coincidently, gonna watch the game at Bonni and Rick's house today.
frankj1 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
DrMaddVibe wrote:
So if you want a balanced budget even with a surplus you have to have a GOP House and Senate. Got it. After all, we do know the President only signs what's put in front of them...or vetoes.

first sentence is mostly true but not for every year.

The times, despite it's issues, were not nearly as contentious as the current times so negotiations had less of a gap to cross. Fewer angry fringe lunatics held office.

But perhaps you've taken notice of how often I say, in different forms, that I was taught to not want to get everything I want...or I'd be part of a ruling party with half the country being oppressed. So ideally, for me, neither side should have total control of those entities for fear of what feels like supporting a Benevolent Dictator...an oxymoron in many ways.
rfenst Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
8trackdisco wrote:
All you have to do is chase out rfenst, Frank, and Brewha and you’ll almost have the pure, one dimensional echo chamber that has been built over the last two years.

Two or so years seems accurate for the most recent hit. Pretty much too late for a bunch of guys. The ship sailed for this and other reasons.

One important reason is gender-identity related opinions and moral mandates. At least three people (maybe four) quit posting because they have children who are gay, considering transitioning or are transitioning. They got sick of the intolerance (after years of being welcomed posters- some a decade or longer).

So too, I believe, is that virtually every single gay or lesbian has been run off.

And, then there are some other major, fixable, issues. that have lead to the drop-off. For example those who tend to jump on a noobs' first posts and give that person $hit such that they never come back.

I'll let the rest of what I observe go for now...
rfenst Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
MACS wrote:
Someone who is for limited government... much, much more limited than we have become. We've gone well and far beyond what was intended. Someone who is for supporting the constitution as it was written. There's no need to interpret sh*t. They said it plain and clear when they wrote it.

Someone who will not negotiate when it comes to getting a balanced budget. STOP the bleeding. STOP sending money to countries that hate us. Stop funding wars in other countries. Stop meddling in other countries' affairs and stop being the world police.

And finally... someone who will support term limits, and transparency when it comes to gov't officials money making. They want to see Trump's tax return?? I want to see ALL of theirs. How did people making 150k become multimillionaires?

And, here I thought everything you mentioned only makes one a patriotic American concerned for the welfare of the nation without regard to politics.
rfenst Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
Abrignac wrote:
Trump didn’t submit a budget that was in anyway balanced. Jus sayin’

On the other hand, I long for someone who has the nutz to say enough is enough. Someone who will say no more tax cuts for anyone until we pay down the debt. Someone who will say “we can’t afford _____, _____, and _____”. We need someone who isn’t afraid to submit a budget that cuts enough so that revenue exceeds expenditures by at least 10% and dedicates the surplus to debt reduction. Someone who will absolutely veto any spending bill that does not accomplish that. Someone who brave enough to tell Congress to get off their ass and send such a bill within the next 30 days.

Right now, no one on the campaign trail has speaks that message.

That person would be generally unelectable.
rfenst Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
RobertHively wrote:
Most of those guys were some of the most trollin mofos to ever log on. I used to call em keyboard commandos.

It's weird to me that now they allegedly claim to be butthurt. Don't you think that's strange? What did I miss?

You ever hear from Izon?

They don't claim to be butt-hurt. They just don't think there is enough exchange of rational discourse anymore so they simply stopped posting. Ad hominem abusive arguments were also a major factor.

BGZ- not a liberal
TW- not a liberal, probably leans conservative
Leo- issue by issue
Zody- not a liberal
Brewha Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
MACS wrote:
Far righties? I'm pretty sure I am further to the right than HD... and I don't consider myself "far" anything. I just see the forest through the trees.


That’s what makes you a pillow of our community.
Never praying a pond the weakness of others.
Despite “lefty” sending you a cyst and diseased order……
Brewha Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
rfenst wrote:
They don't claim to be butt-hurt. They just don't think there is enough exchange of rational discourse anymore so they simply stopped posting. Ad hominem abusive arguments were also a major factor.

BGZ- not a liberal
TW- not a liberal, probably leans conservative
Leo- issue by issue
Zody- not a liberal


As a voice of the “Left” here, I will agree that the forum has shifted away from discussion of issues to middle school level name calling by the “Right”. Because they cannot debate. And when you offer another view they respond with STFU, because that’s all they got.

So, it’s kind of a Right Wing circle jerk here most of the time….
RobertHively Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,893
rfenst wrote:
They don't claim to be butt-hurt. They just don't think there is enough exchange of rational discourse anymore so they simply stopped posting. Ad hominem abusive arguments were also a major factor.

BGZ- not a liberal
TW- not a liberal, probably leans conservative
Leo- issue by issue
Zody- not a liberal



From my perspective them leaving because of Ad Hom attacks is hypocritic on their part. Personal attacks towards me, and many other forum members, from them, was pretty much my first five yrs here.

Victor, TW, BGZ and others constantly attacked me for my thoughts on medical freedom and for my principles, and everything else under the sun. Your boy Spey named me "Qbert".

In the end though, I didn't bend the knee, the wife and I stood on principle concerning "covid", and it cost us our jobs and a lot of other things. What did TW lose, other than respect, when Bucky pounded him into the ground? He got what he dished out.

A bully doesn't have any problem dishing out the hits, up until the moment they get hit back. So, I have no sympathy for them. And like I said, I like TW and BGZ. I wish they would come back.

I don't say anything to anybody online, or in these forums, that I wouldn't say in person.
HockeyDad Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
Brewha wrote:
As a voice of the “Left” here, I will agree that the forum has shifted away from discussion of issues to middle school level name calling by the “Right”. Because they cannot debate. And when you offer another view they respond with STFU, because that’s all they got.

So, it’s kind of a Right Wing circle jerk here most of the time….



I think we can all agree that if all the righties left the forum this would be a better place. MCFA.
rfenst Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
RobertHively wrote:
From my perspective them leaving because of Ad Hom attacks is hypocritic on their part. Personal attacks towards me, and many other forum members, from them, was pretty much my first five yrs here.

Victor, TW, BGZ and others constantly attacked me for my thoughts on medical freedom and for my principles, and everything else under the sun. Your boy Spey named me "Qbert".

In the end though, I didn't bend the knee, the wife and I stood on principle concerning "covid", and it cost us our jobs and a lot of other things. What did TW lose, other than respect, when Bucky pounded him into the ground? He got what he dished out.

A bully doesn't have any problem dishing out the hits, up until the moment they get hit back. So, I have no sympathy for them. And like I said, I like TW and BGZ. I wish they would come back.

I don't say anything to anybody online, or in these forums, that I wouldn't say in person.

Good for you.

I don't agree with personal attacks against or "pigeon-holing" anyone here regardless of their beliefs. But, that is the norm around here now.

And, there is nothing hypocritical about those specifically mentioned not receiving enough pleasure posting and reading here such that they left and highly likely will never come back.

But, it's really not about them. It's about the overall drop-off here, this time over the last 2-3 years...



“I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It”
Voltiere.
Brewha Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
HockeyDad wrote:
I think we can all agree that if all the righties left the forum this would be a better place. MCFA.

No, we do not.

Medium Chain Fatty Acids notwithstanding…



I come here to see the opinions of others:
No government agency can be trusted.
Your own doctor cannot be trusted because he is part of a conspiracy.
That we would be better of with a dictator like Putin in the White House.
That EVs are all about the politics, never mind the tech.
That guns are never a problem.

And you see it all right here.
RayR Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,927
Brewha wrote:
As a voice of the “Left” here, I will agree that the forum has shifted away from discussion of issues to middle school level name calling by the “Right”. Because they cannot debate. And when you offer another view they respond with STFU, because that’s all they got.

So, it’s kind of a Right Wing circle jerk here most of the time….


So when did you start debating? I must have missed that. Brick wall
HockeyDad Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
rfenst wrote:

But, it's really not about them. It's about the overall drop-off here, this time over the last 2-3 years...


So what has changed over the last 2-3 years to cause this very concerning drop-off? I ask that question as someone who has posted here for 23 years.
MACS Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
frankj1 wrote:
I was prepared to skewer you whence we met, but you are so dreamy that I was instantly disarmed.
Still one of the most memorable days we have ever been treated to...coincidently, gonna watch the game at Bonni and Rick's house today.


I get that a lot. Blushing Blushing

It was my pleasure to ferry you, TLC, Bonni and Rick around San Diego Bay in my little fishing boat. I absolutely enjoyed it. The commentary on the naval presence was just a side bonus of being a navy man. Prolly the closest you've been to navy ships, eh?

Had we more time I might have coulda given you the 8track treatment and had one of my Navy Chief buddies give you a tour of a combat ship and hand you a coin.
MACS Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
Cats and dogs living together?? Oh, the huge manatee!!
8trackdisco Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
HockeyDad wrote:
So what has changed over the last 2-3 years to cause this very concerning drop-off? I ask that question as someone who has posted here for 23 years.


Started with George Floyd, Covid, the BLM, LBGT+, Woke. It started out with sharing knowledge, then it turned into a power trip. It rolled from about advocacy, to equality, the CRT, and then the legalized silencing and firing of white straight, Christian males for pushing back- trying to get back to equality.

Add all that to the failure of our institutions, a hard left turn, economic uncertainty, and people not being able to live there life like they could before and people started cracking.

I’m just guessing.
RayR Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,927
frankj1 wrote:
Perot ran in 1992

Clinton was the last POTUS to have a balanced budget...even a surplus IIRC.
In office '93 to 2001
Balanced budget from '98 to 2001

Last POTUS before him to do so was LBJ


Really Frank?...you bought into the...The Clinton Surplus Hoax?
Let's take the WayBack Machine to...

The Surplus Hoax

11/03/2000
Hans F. Sennholz

Quote:
The ever-growing budget surplus of the U.S. Government is exciting the spending instincts of most politicians. It stirs their passions and encourages them to find and concoct new spending programs that will tap into the surplus.

In defense of their position and income, most politicians are ever eager to take as much money as possible from taxpayers so that they may buy the favors of the voters. They wax eloquent about the great benefits of spending but fall silent about the costs and consequences of taxation. Most of them may even engage in the art of fiscal legerdemain which turns a tax into a benefit and a deficit into a surplus. The budget surpluses of the Clinton Administration are current examples of such deception.

https://mises.org/library/surplus-hoax

frankj1 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
go on ahead, call if you ever get back to the present
8trackdisco Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
rfenst wrote:
They don't claim to be butt-hurt. They just don't think there is enough exchange of rational discourse anymore so they simply stopped posting. Ad hominem abusive arguments were also a major factor.

BGZ- not a liberal
TW- not a liberal, probably leans conservative
Leo- issue by issue
Zody- not a liberal


Okay, finer point.

BGZ: More liberal than the farther right people could tolerate. He didn’t “know his place”. He didn’t fall in line and show his belly.
TW: The whipping boy for Covid 19 frustration.
Leo: Ok.
Z: I know he isn’t a liberal. Was asking him to share the other libs in the Exiles video cast.
HockeyDad Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
It still sounds like we are calling for wiping out anyone here that is to the right of a committee-determined acceptable designator.

Can we establish a list of names who need to be expelled so we can make CigarBid fun again and bring back the totally non-liberal non-butthurt people that left? Perhaps a starting point would be to eliminate any MAGA Republican semi-fascists who support Trump. We can do that and let it run for a month and then put together another round of eliminations. I would think that after a few rounds of purging we should be successful at getting this place back to the proper exchange of rational discourse.

RayR Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,927
^ Yes HD. A LAFTY-initiated PURGE is what is needed. That's what Stalin & Hitler would have done.
HockeyDad Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
I heard Mike Pence can overturn the results of the Super Bowl if he has the courage.
HockeyDad Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
RayR wrote:
^ Yes HD. A LAFTY-initiated PURGE is what is needed. That's what Stalin & Hitler would have done.


You just made it on “The List”.
RayR Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,927
HockeyDad wrote:
You just made it on “The List”.


Ya, as a right-wing extremist, I already knew that.
HockeyDad Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
I suppose the other thing we could just acknowledge is that when it comes to political issues, people like their echo chambers. This place wasn’t enough for some and they left to find a more suitable echo chamber. Then they say this place isn’t tolerant enough but sometimes the word they are looking for is “conforming”. The reality is the political conversations here are very tame.

If people were looking for MSNBC forums or an LGBTQIA+ support group, this is not it. This also is not TrumpLove.com or the RushLinbaugh forums. This is a cigar board where sometimes we talk politics and people often are very opinionated about politics. For those who left, I hope they found what they were looking for in their quest. I kinda like it here because it is not an echo chamber. I have climbed highest mountains, I have run through the fields, only to be with you.

People get butthurt over their political echo chambers. Remember the pancakes versus waffles versus French toast war? People didn’t leave over that when French toast won. How about the Fuente versus CAO war? People didn’t leave over that. Nope, it’s always politics where people go full snowflake.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
How can ya have PBJ without the peanut butter or the jelly?

How ya gonna have a Resse's Cup without the chocolate and the peanut butter?

How ya gonna have a cheese burger without the beef or cheese?

You can't.

What's upset (by the look of this thread!) some posters that they want the ability to spout garbage and then gaslight you over it later! Then, (when proven blatantly false!) NEVER admit they were wrong. Never take any of the derision and would continue (and HAVE!) in a New York minute! The ones that left...Bye Felecia! The ones that stay...you're here.

PS: Act like a drooling rainman and ramble with the nonsense you're going to get called names. Nanny nanny boo boo stick your head in doo doo. I really do miss Tosh.0.

PSS: We're not solving ANYTHING with listening stations, dark ops prison/interrogation sites, military bases and boots on the ground. Our CIA and now our fabulous FBI are on the record with election meddling not just in foreign nations but right here at home too. Bring the boys back home.
8trackdisco Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
Impressive.

HD posts five times on this thread today, and DMV actual posted a couple paragraphs of his thoughts, NOT copy and pasting from his Bulgarian Aggregator site.

Awesome day! Awwwwwwwsome!
HockeyDad Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
8trackdisco wrote:
Impressive.

HD posts five times on this thread today, and DMV actual posted a couple paragraphs NOT copy and pasting from his Bulgarian Aggregator site.

Awesome day! Awwwwwwwsome!


Can I still do a purge list? Come on, pleaseee!

I always said I’d be working for the government running a re-education camp.
8trackdisco Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
Certainly, I contributed to them leaving as well. Am not claiming this is a full on, MAGA only phenomenon.

Think I outlined many of the contributing factors to what made everyone crazy(er).

Was asked who left. Provided that.

Was asked why I think they left. Provided that.

Then there was Were They or Weren’t They Liberal.

Disagree with HD on people all wanting to be in their echo chamber. Haven’t looked for an echo chamber mirroring my thoughts. Don’t care to find it if it existed. Maybe Abrignac is similar, as he is curious, and doesn’t seem interested in conforming going into a gasbag chambers.

Back to the IP.
Do I think we should bomb Iran? No.
8trackdisco Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
HockeyDad wrote:
Can I still do a purge list? Come on, pleaseee!

I always said I’d be working for the government running a re-education camp.


You didn’t get where you are today without several corporate purges. C’mon, now.
RobertHively Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,893
8trackdisco wrote:
Certainly, I contributed to them leaving as well. Am not claiming this is a full on, MAGA only phenomenon.


Maybe, just maybe, they contributed to their own exile.

And is it really exile if it's self imposed?

I understand life happens. Trust me. I quit posting regularly bc I didn't have internet. Yet I did still manage to log my cigars.

When I had the option to post, I did. Maybe they will too one day.


Abrignac Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
8trackdisco wrote:
Certainly, I contributed to them leaving as well. Am not claiming this is a full on, MAGA only phenomenon.

Think I outlined many of the contributing factors to what made everyone crazy(er).

Was asked who left. Provided that.

Was asked why I think they left. Provided that.

Then there was Were They or Weren’t They Liberal.

Disagree with HD on people all wanting to be in their echo chamber. Haven’t looked for an echo chamber mirroring my thoughts. Don’t care to find it if it existed. Maybe Abrignac is similar, as he is curious, and doesn’t seem interested in conforming going into a gasbag chambers.

Back to the IP.
Do I think we should bomb Iran? No.


It seems I vacillate between not G’ing AF what anyone thinks to calling out anyone who posts clearly uninformed nonsense picked up for a biased source. So at face value I don’t want to be in an echo chamber. If I’m wrong, so be it. Otherwise be prepared to defend a viewpoint.
8trackdisco Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
Abrignac wrote:
It seems I vacillate between not G’ing AF what anyone thinks to calling out anyone who posts clearly uninformed nonsense picked up for a biased source. So at face value I don’t want to be in an echo chamber. If I’m wrong, so be it. Otherwise be prepared to defend a viewpoint.


Yep. Exactly what I’ve experienced with you. An independent thinker. Keep it up, Anthony.
rfenst Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
Abrignac wrote:
[B]e prepared to defend a viewpoint.

Exactly.
Promote, rather than destroy discourse. Stop hijacking threads.
drglnc Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
Echo Chambers are for those with closed minds that are either unwilling or unable to think and learn...

I disagree with ALOT in theses posts but also learn ALOT... i even listen and watch news sources that i hate because i know they will provide a different view point and provoke thought. having to defend ones position makes that person more knowledgeable in that position by the very nature of needing to defend it... unless you are one of those that just regresses to name calling and regurgitating of proven false conspiracies... in which case, at least we get to laugh at you.
HockeyDad Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
I’m not seeing a lot of support for bombing Iran yet. How about we bomb Venezuela? They are threatening to attack Guyana.

HockeyDad Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
Totally separate question for the Democrats here:

Are we supposed to stand for the Black National Anthem, the White National Anthem, or both? Do you only stand for the one that matches your skin color and how does how you identify fit into it?
drglnc Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 715
HockeyDad wrote:
Totally separate question for the Democrats here:

Are we supposed to stand for the Black National Anthem, the White National Anthem, or both? Do you only stand for the one that matches your skin color and how does how you identify fit into it?


Why not stand for both? or kneel as you see fit...

Lift Every Voice and Sing was adopted as the “black national anthem” during segregation and more then a decade before the star spangled banner was officially adopted as the US National Anthem…




MACS Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
I think it's divisive. We ARE one nation. Black history IS American history. To have separate this or that is not inclusive AT ALL, it's divisive.
DrafterX Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
What happens if you take a knee during the black national anthem..?? Think
HockeyDad Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
drglnc wrote:
Why not stand for both? or kneel as you see fit...

Lift Every Voice and Sing was adopted as the “black national anthem” during segregation and more then a decade before the star spangled banner was officially adopted as the US National Anthem…



So are there rules? I heard some democrat congressman complaining about the crowd at the Super Bowl not getting it right.
DrafterX Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
drglnc wrote:
Why not stand for both? or kneel as you see fit...

Lift Every Voice and Sing was adopted as the “black national anthem” during segregation and more then a decade before the star spangled banner was officially adopted as the US National Anthem…






By who..?? Huh
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>