8trackdisco wrote:Didn't say I didn't want your answers. Was curious. Freedom and get rolling on a solution are nice campaign slogans.
Assuming they came up with a shot in the time frame they did, how much longer would you test it, vs. the time frame used?
Whether you say an extra day or and extra year or decade, there is no clue on how many more people would have died.
Your approach would have cost more lives and is little on the detail. Plus, 98.2% of the elephants here would still call you a tyrant or idiot. I don't think you are either, but I'm really happy neither of us are in charge of the Covid response. Tim was way down the pyramid and now he's the devil here.
Well, he claimed to know more than we did, and now it turns out what he "knew" was wrong... so... there's that.
The world is not safe. It's never going to be safe. Life is terminal. The gov't can't change that and history has shown us every time they try to help, it does the exact opposite.
The shot hasn't prevented anyone from contracting covid. They now claim that it doesn't do that, when they first said it did. Does it really help people? Are there solid studies of that, yet?
I've read that studies are now showing that people who did not get the shot and contracted and recovered from covid are much better off against it, now. *shrug*
How the hell do we know what the frank to believe nowadays? We've been franking lied to so much I trust nothing anymore.