America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by RMAN4443. 83 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Steelers
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
tailgater Offline
#1 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 2:43 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Or should I say, who will the Patriots be playing in the superbowl after three consecutive bye weeks...?
Herfing
jackconrad Offline
#2 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 3:47 PM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
STEELERS AND PACKERS ARE HOT ,TEXANS FOUND FLAWS AND BRADY LOOKED BEATABLE
gummy jones Offline
#3 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 3:49 PM EST
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
stillers need to put it in the endzone

they will need at least 27 to beat the patsies in foxboro
SteveS Offline
#4 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 4:18 PM EST
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
tailgater wrote:
Or should I say, who will the Patriots be playing in the superbowl after three consecutive bye weeks...?
Herfing


I had to read this a couple of times before I got it ... initially, I thought you were suggesting that "Steelers" was the answer to the question of who would the Pats be playing in the SuperBowl ...

I hope you're right that the AFC Championship game this week will be much the same as the Pats getting a bye ... I'm beyond sick to death of the Steelers ... it had been my hope that the Chiefs would prevail, but ...

As for the NFC ... I'd like to see the Falcons win that one ... I really have no dog in that fight, but find Aaron Rodgers to be an arrogant a**hole and would like to see him sent packing (no pun intended) ...
tailgater Offline
#5 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 5:58 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I hope Atlanta wins because Rogers scares me.

Or is it a rogering scares me?

Either way.
tailgater Offline
#6 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 5:59 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
jackconrad wrote:
STEELERS AND PACKERS ARE HOT ,TEXANS FOUND FLAWS AND BRADY LOOKED BEATABLE


Yeah.
Patriots looked Terrible!
That's why they only won by 18 and beat the 16 point spread.
whip
Whistlebritches Offline
#7 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 8:11 PM EST
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
jackconrad wrote:
STEELERS AND PACKERS ARE HOT ,TEXANS FOUND FLAWS AND BRADY LOOKED BEATABLE


Pat's put up 34 on a bad day.Every team has one occasionally.........glad to get it behind us.Now if Pittsburgh has as much trouble in the red zone as they did in KC................it's gonna be a long day for the Squealers.
MACS Offline
#8 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 8:17 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
tailgater wrote:
Yeah.
Patriots looked Terrible!
That's why they only won by 18 and beat the 16 point spread.


You know they played like sh*t and only won because Osweiler sucks. Why not just say it? It doesn't make you look weak, it makes you look like someone with a firm grasp on reality.

You been hangin' wit Mr. Jones?
Whistlebritches Offline
#9 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 8:47 PM EST
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
MACS wrote:
You know they played like sh*t and only won because Osweiler sucks. Why not just say it? It doesn't make you look weak, it makes you look like someone with a firm grasp on reality.

You been hangin' wit Mr. Jones?



Mr Jones........I think you're being a little rough on TG
MACS Offline
#10 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 8:48 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Whistlebritches wrote:
Mr Jones........I think you're being a little rough on TG


Purely for a reality reference point, sir...
tailgater Offline
#11 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 8:52 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
MACS wrote:
You know they played like sh*t and only won because Osweiler sucks. Why not just say it? It doesn't make you look weak, it makes you look like someone with a firm grasp on reality.

You been hangin' wit Mr. Jones?


Of course they looked like sh*t.
Mr. Jones was calling plays into Brady's helmet.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#12 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 9:08 PM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
I thought that was the other way around...
MACS Offline
#13 Posted: Mon, Jan 16 2017, 10:12 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
tailgater wrote:
Of course they looked like sh*t.
Mr. Jones was calling plays into Brady's helmet.



Well played, sir... well played!
Hank_The_Tank Offline
#14 Posted: Tue, Jan 17 2017, 7:41 AM EST
Joined: 11-15-2016
Posts: 3,677
GO STEELERS! Shock and awe!
RMAN4443 Offline
#15 Posted: Tue, Jan 17 2017, 2:31 PM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Hank_The_Tank wrote:
GO STEELERS! Shock and awe!




hopefully more Shocked and AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!Herfing
tailgater Offline
#16 Posted: Tue, Jan 17 2017, 4:39 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Shocked and Awe Sh*t.

I heard the halftime show was Ben raping some chick in the bathroom.
Leave your wimmin' at home!
teedubbya Offline
#17 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 12:40 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
You do realize you had a player murdering people between games right? Actually convicted of it.
tailgater Offline
#18 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 1:06 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
You do realize you had a player murdering people between games right? Actually convicted of it.


Let's see:

Cut the murderer before formal charges are brought.
vs.
Keep the rapist. Up his contract. Make him the face of the team.

I'm sorry.
What was your point?

I don't blame the Rooney family for the rape.
Just for sweeping it under the rug and paying the perpetrator.
teedubbya Offline
#19 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 1:27 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Let's see:

Cut the murderer before formal charges are brought.
vs.
Keep the rapist. Up his contract. Make him the face of the team.

I'm sorry.
What was your point?

I don't blame the Rooney family for the rape.
Just for sweeping it under the rug and paying the perpetrator.






Or....

No conviction etc. Vs conviction (although I will give props to the Patriots to cutting someone who murdered as a hobby in between games while still adhering to the patriot way (who is their new WR?)

Honestly only a Homer could look at the fact they had a murderer (likely multiple) on their team and be so blind to think the team dropping him before formal charges were filed (but obvious where it was going) is somehow altruistic. They knew who he was. They likely didn't know the depth of his depravity went to murder, but they knew exactly who he was and swept it under the rug as long as possible. They were facing an impossible situation.

And rapelessburger is a scumbag too. Don't get confused that this is a defense of him or the stealers but only the patriot fansite yourteamcheats.com (or whatever) would weigh an unconvicted rape higher than multiple murder in the uniform. Even if you think that is arguable it's an odd grenade to lob given the circumstance unless you think your ****te doesn't stink.

Why not just rely on the fact that the Pats are the best team in football, the steelers suck balls, and the path to the superbowl seems pretty easy at this point?

But um yea....
tailgater Offline
#20 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 1:47 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Or....

No conviction etc. Vs conviction (although I will give props to the Patriots to cutting someone who murdered as a hobby in between games while still adhering to the patriot way (who is their new WR?)

Honestly only a Homer could look at the fact they had a murderer (likely multiple) on their team and be so blind to think the team dropping him before formal charges were filed (but obvious where it was going) is somehow altruistic. They knew who he was. They likely didn't know the depth of his depravity went to murder, but they knew exactly who he was and swept it under the rug as long as possible. They were facing an impossible situation.

And rapelessburger is a scumbag too. Don't get confused that this is a defense of him or the stealers but only the patriot fansite yourteamcheats.com (or whatever) would weigh an unconvicted rape higher than multiple murder in the uniform. Even if you think that is arguable it's an odd grenade to lob given the circumstance unless you think your ****te doesn't stink.

Why not just rely on the fact that the Pats are the best team in football, the steelers suck balls, and the path to the superbowl seems pretty easy at this point?

But um yea....


Hernandez was a Tight End, not a wide receiver.
Although after this much jail time, that may have changed.
(thanks for the set up on that one, TW).

Nobody said the Pats were altruistic. You must still be butt hurt from the steelers beating your chiefs without even getting into the endzone because you're looking for things to argue.
I didn't mention yourteamcheats.com because I don't care what some blog says.

And truth be told, I"m just trying to wake up the usually banter-iffic towel wavers. There's a game Sunday and they're all acting like the foregone conclusion (a Pats win) is the foregone conclusion.
teedubbya Offline
#21 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 1:58 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Hernandez was a Tight End, not a wide receiver.
Although after this much jail time, that may have changed.
(thanks for the set up on that one, TW).

I was referring to Floyd but you are welcome LOL

Nobody said the Pats were altruistic. You must still be butt hurt from the steelers beating your chiefs without even getting into the endzone because you're looking for things to argue.

Nah, I'd be arguing the other way if that was the case. Besides I'm more sore about the Dallas game and my entire immediate family are Green Bay fans.

I didn't mention yourteamcheats.com because I don't care what some blog says.

Agreed, and it's a bunk sight (but brilliant of a fan base to create it...I admire that)

And truth be told, I"m just trying to wake up the usually banter-iffic towel wavers. There's a game Sunday and they're all acting like the foregone conclusion (a Pats win) is the foregone conclusion.

That we agree on
Hank_The_Tank Offline
#22 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 2:16 PM EST
Joined: 11-15-2016
Posts: 3,677
As much as I want my Steelers to win, they are going to have to play a perfect game to stand a chance. Just the truth. That or the Pats have to have a terrible game.
sdboltsfan86 Offline
#23 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 2:58 PM EST
Joined: 11-10-2016
Posts: 41
Tight end not a wide receiver until prison joke is the best thing I have seen on this forum. Thank you tailgater, you made my day lol
Buckwheat Offline
#24 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 3:05 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
gummy jones wrote:
stillers need to put it in the endzone

they will need at least 27 to beat the patsies in foxboro


+1
tailgater Offline
#25 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 3:44 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sdboltsfan86 wrote:
Tight end not a wide receiver until prison joke is the best thing I have seen on this forum. Thank you tailgater, you made my day lol


You're welcome.
Now change your handle.
tailgater Offline
#26 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 3:45 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
TW, what are you talking about with Michael Floyd?
youngra Offline
#27 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 3:46 PM EST
Joined: 11-07-2011
Posts: 1,885
Steelers Packers in the Superbowl! HERE WE GO!!!!!!!!
dstieger Offline
#28 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 3:47 PM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
LOL....less than two months from 'join with cool nick repping my nfl team'....to obsolete.....fan of team that bailed on fans....ouch
teedubbya Offline
#29 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 7:05 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
TW, what are you talking about with Michael Floyd?



They signed him how many days after this?

http://www.tmz.com/2016/12/20/michael-floyd-dui-arrest-video/


I think it was 2 or 3 days later they signed him. The dude had a BAC of .217. Of course Bill B. said he didn't realize the severity of the situation (because he is so sloppy and pays no attention to details(sound familiar?)) and of course he cant talk about it any further because it is a legal situation. I'm sure it has nothing to do with putting the need for a receiver ahead of bad behavior and was giving the dude the second chance he deserved immediately following the incident and being chastised and released by his team for being unrepentant.

I'm sure this culture had nothing to do with Hernandez.

Squeeky clean.
Whistlebritches Offline
#30 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 9:53 PM EST
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
teedubbya wrote:
They signed him how many days after this?

http://www.tmz.com/2016/12/20/michael-floyd-dui-arrest-video/


I think it was 2 or 3 days later they signed him. The dude had a BAC of .217. Of course Bill B. said he didn't realize the severity of the situation (because he is so sloppy and pays no attention to details(sound familiar?)) and of course he cant talk about it any further because it is a legal situation. I'm sure it has nothing to do with putting the need for a receiver ahead of bad behavior and was giving the dude the second chance he deserved immediately following the incident and being chastised and released by his team for being unrepentant.

I'm sure this culture had nothing to do with Hernandez.

Squeeky clean.



Without watching the video,no time.

It's a DUI...........comparing this to murder or rape is equivalent to comparing apples and elephants.I'm sure the law was laid down to Floyd,there will be no strike 3 in this at bat.
teedubbya Offline
#31 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 10:02 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Actually .217 is aggregated. Meaning jail time. And no it is neither rape or murder. To me a conviction of murder is worse than an allegation of rape is worse than a pretty obvious comatose drunk driving.

But if you are going to accuse another team of sweeping an allegation of rape under the rug and call that bad, then signing a wr a few days after the video (wr) is pretty hard to defend.

Not saying they are worse. Just cut the holier than thou crap.
teedubbya Offline
#32 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 10:03 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
And belicheck not bowing the seriousness when signing is laughable.

Homers be homers.
teedubbya Offline
#33 Posted: Wed, Jan 18 2017, 10:06 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Knowing not bowing damn phone.

The pats are no worse and no better than anyone else. Their culture allowed a murderer to thrive. Unfortunately I think it could have happened with most teams. This time it happened to be the Pats. And they just signed another high character winner!
tailgater Offline
#34 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 10:46 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Actually .217 is aggregated. Meaning jail time. And no it is neither rape or murder. To me a conviction of murder is worse than an allegation of rape is worse than a pretty obvious comatose drunk driving.

But if you are going to accuse another team of sweeping an allegation of rape under the rug and call that bad, then signing a wr a few days after the video (wr) is pretty hard to defend.

Not saying they are worse. Just cut the holier than thou crap.


"allegation" means you don't believe the girl.
The girl who was raped.
While her friends were held at bay, away from the restroom. Because their friend was drunk and alone with him.
In the bathroom.


Floyd was wrong and should face the consequences. But it's not in the same league with what Ben did.
If it was just consensual sex, then why the body guards to keep her friends away?
Forget bathroom. If that happened in a college dorm it would be considered rape.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#35 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 11:18 AM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
On my face book page from 3 years ago:

"One of the commentators really just said of Tom Brady's drastic overthrow, "Sometimes you throw the ball soooo well it just goes a little bit further than you expect it to."
tailgater Offline
#36 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 2:42 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
opelmanta1900 wrote:
On my face book page from 3 years ago:

"One of the commentators really just said of Tom Brady's drastic overthrow, "Sometimes you throw the ball soooo well it just goes a little bit further than you expect it to."


I make love soooo well that I finish before I thought I would.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#37 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 3:02 PM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Well ok, now that actually kinda makes sense...
tailgater Offline
#38 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 4:19 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
And belicheck not bowing the seriousness when signing is laughable.

Homers be homers.


Who said anything about Belichick not knowing?

You're looking for blind faith were there isn't any. And it eats you up, so you make stuff up.
haterz be haterz.
teedubbya Offline
#39 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 4:40 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
"allegation" means you don't believe the girl.
The girl who was raped.
While her friends were held at bay, away from the restroom. Because their friend was drunk and alone with him.
In the bathroom.


Floyd was wrong and should face the consequences. But it's not in the same league with what Ben did.
If it was just consensual sex, then why the body guards to keep her friends away?
Forget bathroom. If that happened in a college dorm it would be considered rape.






I don't put rape in the same category as comatose driving as I said earlier so that is non starter.

It's still odd to sign a player a few days after the video and arrest and after his team cut him and admonished him for not being the slightest bit repentant while the team claims to be pure as the driven snow and it's fans are critical of other teams perceived integrity issues. It just doesn't add up ignoring the hot mess surrounding having an active murderer play a few games in between murders (the ones we know of).

As for Big Ben I'm not defending him. I think he is a scum bag (but his part in the movie should be played by Will Farrell) and I didn't realize he was convicted so it is more than an allegation. He should be cut and join a lacrosse team somewhere.

I'm not even saying Floyd shouldn't be in the league at some point but to get signed a few days later while other teams passed and think it's not stankiy is silly. That dog don't hunt. They needed a WR immediately for the playoffs and integrity came second. It's not unusual, but it's still lipstick on a pig.
teedubbya Offline
#40 Posted: Thu, Jan 19 2017, 4:48 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Who said anything about Belichick not knowing?

You're looking for blind faith were there isn't any. And it eats you up, so you make stuff up.
haterz be haterz.







Belichick was asked Wednesday if the team knew the full extent of Floyd's situation; body cam footage showed Floyd passed out behind the wheel of his SUV at a traffic light and police knocking on the window to try to wake him.

“Yeah, we were aware of his situation when we claimed him,” the coach replied.

On Thursday, however, after news broke that Floyd had a BAC of .217, according to a police report, Belichick said he was unaware that Floyd's BAC was nearly three times the legal limit for Arizona.

“No, not if it was just released,” said Belichick, who wouldn't further comment.

Under Arizona law, Floyd's BAC is considered a "Super Extreme DUI," which means he faces a mandatory sentence of 45 days in jail.



I wasn't saying he was unaware of the situation, but he was unaware of the severity (or says he was) or perhaps just didn't care which is worse. It seems to me those may have been good things to ask Mr. Floyd regardless of when they were released to the public. They could have talked to the Cardinals as well who seemed to have enough to release him much like the Pats did the murderer.

*shrug* you are ok with it. I'm sure most Pats fans are. But back to how other teams and their players have no integity.
tailgater Offline
#41 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 9:59 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Belichick was asked Wednesday if the team knew the full extent of Floyd's situation; body cam footage showed Floyd passed out behind the wheel of his SUV at a traffic light and police knocking on the window to try to wake him.

“Yeah, we were aware of his situation when we claimed him,” the coach replied.

On Thursday, however, after news broke that Floyd had a BAC of .217, according to a police report, Belichick said he was unaware that Floyd's BAC was nearly three times the legal limit for Arizona.

“No, not if it was just released,” said Belichick, who wouldn't further comment.

Under Arizona law, Floyd's BAC is considered a "Super Extreme DUI," which means he faces a mandatory sentence of 45 days in jail.



I wasn't saying he was unaware of the situation, but he was unaware of the severity (or says he was) or perhaps just didn't care which is worse. It seems to me those may have been good things to ask Mr. Floyd regardless of when they were released to the public. They could have talked to the Cardinals as well who seemed to have enough to release him much like the Pats did the murderer.

*shrug* you are ok with it. I'm sure most Pats fans are. But back to how other teams and their players have no integity.


Do you comprehend what you write?
On Wednesday Belichick admits he knows all the information on Floyd.
On Thursday more information is released.

Where did you lose the progression?
Bill even gives you a hint: "not if it was just released".


I'll let you in on a little secret: Beilichick won't give out any information that isn't fully vetted by himself personally. His Wednesday answer was 100% accurate, and his Thursday response was even more so.
You're just trying to muddy the water in order to make a point of some sort.
teedubbya Offline
#42 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 10:13 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
im just calling it as I see it and I forgive you for not comprehending what I wrote.

Apparantly Bill only knew what was publicly released and when it was publicly released. He knows no more about his player than you or I. Which completely supports what I said. He was not aware of the severity or claims he was. Neither of us knows if what he is saying is 100% (or higher) accurate because we don't know if he had more information than publicly available. It is accurate in terms of what was publicly available. I don't really care and that was never my point if you actually read what I wrote.

I'll take him at his word. he got no info from his player or the Cards and did no vetting whatsoever in their rush to sign a wr at all cost with no regard to integrity.

Keep it simple though. Floyd passes out driving. Blows an ungodly bac. Gets released by his team because of the deed and being publicly chastised for being unrepentant then the Pats signed him a few days later only having publicly available information with no vetting at all and I'm sure are shocked that gambling (or murder) is going on in their club.

Got it. On to other teams lack of integrity.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#43 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 10:18 AM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
tailgater wrote:
Do you comprehend what you write?
On Wednesday Belichick admits he knows all the information on Floyd.
On Thursday more information is released.

Where did you lose the progression?
Bill even gives you a hint: "not if it was just released".


I'll let you in on a little secret: Beilichick won't give out any information that isn't fully vetted by himself personally. His Wednesday answer was 100% accurate, and his Thursday response was even more so.
You're just trying to muddy the water in order to make a point of some sort.


even more so than 100%? I wonder if you comprehend what you write... Herfing
teedubbya Offline
#44 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 10:41 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The human minds ability to justify things is something I've completely underestimated until fairly recently.

By the way that Rachel Maddow dude loves the Pats and Bob Kraft.
tailgater Offline
#45 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 3:07 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
opelmanta1900 wrote:
even more so than 100%? I wonder if you comprehend what you write... Herfing


Are you 110% sure about that?
tailgater Offline
#46 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 3:13 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
im just calling it as I see it and I forgive you for not comprehending what I wrote.

Apparantly Bill only knew what was publicly released and when it was publicly released. He knows no more about his player than you or I. Which completely supports what I said. He was not aware of the severity or claims he was. Neither of us knows if what he is saying is 100% (or higher) accurate because we don't know if he had more information than publicly available. It is accurate in terms of what was publicly available. I don't really care and that was never my point if you actually read what I wrote.

I'll take him at his word. he got no info from his player or the Cards and did no vetting whatsoever in their rush to sign a wr at all cost with no regard to integrity.

Keep it simple though. Floyd passes out driving. Blows an ungodly bac. Gets released by his team because of the deed and being publicly chastised for being unrepentant then the Pats signed him a few days later only having publicly available information with no vetting at all and I'm sure are shocked that gambling (or murder) is going on in their club.

Got it. On to other teams lack of integrity.


LOL!
That SOOOO wasn't your point.
You thought you caught Belichick in a lie.
Only his words, the English laguage and that pesky reading comprehension thingy got in your way.

We've witnessed this previously when you, for some reason, refused to accept the laws of physics.
Some would say you're obsessed.
teedubbya Offline
#47 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 4:26 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No I really didn't think I caught him in a lie in terms of his words and quote. Not at all. I think the pats are a top notch organization in terms of preparation and research so I find it hard to believe they didn't do their due diligence.

But if you read all of my posts starting at post 29 I said bill b said he didn't realize the severity when signing him. You questioned that. The quote was merely to support that. He says he didn't have all the details.

I don't believe him but don't think he's been caught in a lie. I think it's alive and well.

You really need to learn how to read.
teedubbya Offline
#48 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 4:28 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
But all your diversion aside they needed a wr at all cost and got one without regard to integrity by signing Floyd a few days after these events. But back to bashing the integrity of other teams and their players.
tailgater Offline
#49 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 8:31 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
If that makes you feel better, stick with it.
But you give a lot of details just to say the Pats hired a DUI WR.
A reasonable person would likely assume you meant a little more than you're admitting to.

I just hope Floyd stays sober enough to play.
teedubbya Offline
#50 Posted: Fri, Jan 20 2017, 8:38 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I said what I had to say. You don't have to guess or make it something else then argue with that. I was pretty clear.

In the end the pats are no better or worse than any other team in this regard.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top