cacman wrote:Are you sure about that??? His play may have contributed to the Pens trading him.
There's a fine line between old time hockey and taking dirty shots. Orpik crosses the line on many occasions.
Capitals’ Brooks Orpik suspended three games for hit on Penguins’ Olli Maatta
May 1, 2016
"The resulting injury and Orpik’s disciplinary history — he has been suspended twice previously — led to the ruling."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/1/capitals-brooks-orpik-suspend-olli-maatta-penguins/
Brooks Orpik frustrated with his penalties
October 30, 2015
"Orpik leads the team with 12 penalty infraction minutes for six minors. His average of 1 minute 30 seconds puta him on pace for 123; he had 66 last year. Orpik, 35, hasn’t had more than 70 penalty minutes since the 2008-09 season, so it’s unlikely that trend will change this year; after just eight games, it’s too small a sample size to accurately project Orpik’s penalty minutes. Orpik’s penalty minutes rank 40th in the league.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capitals-insider/wp/2015/10/30/brooks-orpik-frustrated-with-his-penalties/
Thought you where rooting for the Pens Gummy???
i am for the pens but have always liked orpik - he, to me, is a throwback defender
i just enjoy the sport and try to be more objective than the typical homer
brooksy had a whopping 24 penalty minutes this past year [*was injured for a time], 66 the year before, 46 the year before that, 32 the year before that...[so on and so forth]
kris letang, for example, had 66 penalty minutes this year and 79 the year before
his last suspension was the 2005-2006 season
"dirty" is purely subjective. its like porn: you know it when you see it. but i think we can all say that the hit on maata was dirty. as far as measuring "dirtiness," if it is by any actual measurables [penalty minutes, game misconducts, fighting majors, suspensions] it is hard to say that brooks fits that category. he is relentless and hard hitting in a day and age where many guys play a prettier game but there is a difference between a bruising style and intent to injure.